Question

For initial thread posts in this discussion forum, please discuss a case of applying the Criteria for Evaluating Theories to a case of competing theories/explanations you've encountered in your own life (or from everyday life).

Next, try to use what we've learned about critical thinking in morality and the law to reconstruct (with numbered premises and conclusions) and evaluate one moral or legal argument from your own lived experience and everyday life.

Answer 1

Hin class, as teacher, I follow the formative evaluation theory to to find out the progress of the students. With the formative evaluation theory it is possible to get a continuous report throughout whole year of the students. It also includes the other parts of the children like his creative quality, cooperation, helping attitude decency, class activities etc.

In this process of evolution the little birds of the textbook is taken as test. The whole test book is divided in many small parts and throughout the whole year test is taken and at the end of the year the total percentage of the marks is calculated. It is very scientific because the test takes place through the whole year and the students never neglect their study.

Again in my life we have to this many situation where I have to be apply the critical evolution theory to judge some individuals. There are many types of people and we have to face these people. With the help of critical evaluation theory we can judge the people, their behaviour and attitudes to us. We can also judge whether it is right to make any kind of relationship with them.

In critical evolution theory we need to follow some ethical principles:

• We should be aware about the fact that whether we are behaving in impartial or partial way.
• we should be aware whether there is any logical and scientific base of the revolution.
• The method must be very logical and sound. There should be transparency in evaluation.