Question

What would be an example of a learning situation where Hull’s theory does not fit? give references for your answer

Answer 1

Hull gave drive reduction theory.

Components of Hull's theory :

1 Need : a physiological imbalance in the body

2 Drive : a state of tension

3 Goal : an objective that reduces drive or tension

So as per Hulls theory there is a physiological change in the body(need) that creates a state of tension ( drive ) in the body after which the individual performs an activity to accomplish a goal which reduces the drive and eases the tension in the body and satisfies the need.

For example : eating in response to hunger.

However Hulls theory in simple words cannot justify actions of people in situations where there is no drive or tension leading upto the behaviour

Eg : eating when not hungry

drinking when not thirsty