Question

2. Explain Social Contract theory in relation to the Prisoner’s Dilemma.

Answer 1

The conditions under which Prisoner-Dilemma write circumstances emerge:

1. It must be a circumstance in which individuals' interests are influenced by what they do as well as by what other individuals do also;

2. It must be a circumstance in which, incomprehensibly, everybody will wind up more awful off on the off chance that they exclusively seek after their own advantages than if they at the same time do what isn't in their own individual advantages.

Illustration: Suppose you live in a society that has exceptionally dirtying autos. You can introduce a gadget that will prevent the pollution from your auto, yet it will cost some money. On the off chance that others utilize the gadget, at that point the air will be spotless (your auto wouldn't make the air extremely messy without anyone else's input). Along these lines, in the event that others utilize the gadget, at that point it is to your greatest advantage not to, keeping in mind the end goal to spare money. Then again, on the off chance that others aren't utilizing the gadget, at that point the air will be messy regardless of whether you utilize it. In this manner, you had should not utilize it, since you just put yourself off guard on the off chance that you do. This argument takes after an indistinguishable example from the Prisoner's Dilemma argument. Since everybody can take after a similar thinking, nobody will utilize the gadget and everybody will be more terrible off because of pollution. Unless, obviously, we are largely gatherings to a coupling contract which expects us to utilize the gadget with the goal that we as a whole advantage.

As per SCT, morality is simply such an agreement.