Should violent speech be free speech?" Should al-Timimi's advocacy of violence be unlawful? Why or why not?
Violent speech should not be free speech as this will lead to the perpetuation of global violence. Al-Tamimi's advocacy of violence should be considered unlawful as; his speech was very dangerous and harmful; in his speech, he encouraged coercive practices he gave information; for arriving at the Lashkar-e Taiba camp without being noticed or discovered. This jeopardized the safety of the people of the United States. Hence it not and should not be protected under the first amendment.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.