Question

When it comes to issues such as stem cell research, abortion and same-sex marriage, what does Michael Sandel say about the possibility of remaining morally neutral when deciding these issues? Do you think he's right? Why or why not?

Answer 1

An, Michael Sandal is most popular political philosopher of his generation who teaches at Harvard, His question to the students is not regarding increasing their wealth rather he challenges them to address the fundament question about how society is organized, he argues that it is vital the democratic health of society to identify the big question that lie behind everyday conflict and resumption.

Michael Sandals main aim is to bring morality back into political debate. He wants to return the discussion to which foe common good to the society.

The stem cell research involves the destruction of human embryo for research purpose it is like yanking an organ from a baby to safe others life, If the research is done with the purpose of saving one’s life even the critics of stem cell hesitate to hesitate to take the full implication of embryo objection, actually the stem cell research give promises to cure Alzheimer’s disease diabetes and spinal cord injury but if it is not used in proper manner the eggs can be used for hymen cloning, Sandals keeps morality always on the higher level , In the year 2006 George Bush the president had made it illegal to create grow and abort fetuses for research purposes, In the third bill he allowed research by stem cell without destruction of embryo cell,

The abortion and homosexuality depends upon morality and immorality of the practice but these form the sophisticated view rejects, in bother the cases the sophisticated keep aside both moral and religious value aside for the purpose of justice. Two kind of judgment According to him abortion and homosexuality are morally apprehensible therefore worthy of prohibition other avoid passing judgment on morality of these practices, in practice these kind go judgment is difficult to practice