Question

Philosophy

QUESTION 4

To make a good argument for the death penalty on retributive grounds what WOULDN'T one have to show?

	a.	it deters crime
	b.	it punishes in a way that fits the crime
	c.	what the most serious crimes are
	d.	whether retribution can be a good basis for legal punishment

0.5 points   

QUESTION 5

To make good argument for the death penalty on deterrence grounds, what WOULDN'T one have to show?

	a.	deterrence works better than other alternatives
	b.	deterrence is proven, with studies, to prevent crime
	c.	criminals value their lives just as much as we value ours
	d.	deterrence is applicable to all crimes

0.5 points   

QUESTION 6

Some argue that legal punishment is morally justifiable if it

	a.	sets a standard
	b.	has precedents in legal history
	c.	doesn't violate the harm principle
	d.	deters crime

0.5 points   

QUESTION 7

Some people argue that cloning, among other things, would confuse

	a.	family issues
	b.	money issues
	c.	nature vs. nurture debates
	d.	knowledge

0.5 points   

QUESTION 8

Consider this question: Should your employer be able to access your genetic information? This question is about

	a.	genetic screening
	b.	genetic modification
	c.	genetic engineering
	d.	genetic determination

0.5 points   

QUESTION 9

When legal punishment is used to make people pay for a crime it is

	a.	deterrence
	b.	retributive
	c.	fair
	d.	helpful to the social order

0.5 points   

QUESTION 10

Which one is NOT a reason to value privacy?

	a.	negative feelings like shame would arise with too many of our actions
	b.	the control of personal information is not possible without privacy
	c.	privacy is the foundation for every act of goodness
	d.	privacy helps in the formation and continuation of personal relationships

0.5 points   

Answer 1

4. The answer is Option C. Showing what the most serious crimes are would not help in the argument for death penalty on retributive grounds.

5. The answer is Option C. Showing that criminals value their lives just as much as we value ours would not help in this argument for death penalty on deterrence grounds.

6. The answer is Option C. Arguments for legal punishment being morally justifiable emphasize on it not violating the harm principle.

7. The answer is Option C. Cloning can confuse nature vs. nurture debates.

Please post the other questions separately, as we are supposed to answer just one or four subparts of a question.