Question

Henrietta is aware that her elderly client, Omar, has had his driver's license revoked due to several minor accidents. She notices, however, that Omar drives himself to his therapy session. She shares her concern with him, and Omar leaves the session in an agitated state and does not return.

In reading the case study for Unit 5, do you believe the therapist has a duty to notify the authorities? Why or why not? If she discloses the information, could this be considered a breach of confidentiality?

Answer 1

Answer -

Henrietta have to have given Omar a record at the same time as he at the start drew in her as an representative, in which she have to have plot her safety tactics and clarified at the same time as the secrecy amongst a representative and a patron falls auxiliary to the expert's commitments to reveal. It has, at that component the state of affairs is marginally extraordinary Omar will recognize that his expert is obliged to break class withinside the event that she feels the patron could be putting each himself or others in drawing near peril. For this state of affairs, we can also additionally need to contend that given Omar's information of causing mishaps, his proceeding to stress is setting others at intense hazard. Be that as it can also additionally, the inquiry at that component becomes, the path of activities is huge proper right here.

An representative is not permitted to penetrate privacy essentially in moderate of the fact that she realizes her patron to overstep the law, as Omar is doing proper right here, except if there may be an drawing near risk seen to each patron or the overall population. For the expert penetrating secrecy, we can also additionally need to highlight the way that Omar has left the workplace, reputedly in his wrongfully determined vehicle, in a disturbed U.S. He is an older man, he is unsettled, and he has a past complete of causing mishaps. He ought now not be driving. The representative can also additionally need to contend that she observed the risk to the overall population and to Omar himself to be brief proper right here a quit end result of his perspective. On the opportunity hand, we can also additionally need to contend that, having cautioned Omar of what she knows, the expert has completed all she is legitimately permitted to do except if the or vital government requests that her find out facts making use of a court docket request. In any case, the fomented appears to move the issue from one in each of lawful concern (Omar is violating the law) to at least one in each of brief physical worry for the electricity of the affected character and the overall population.