Question

Subjects in the weapon condition were only slightly, but not significantly, less accurate than controls on...

Subjects in the weapon condition were only slightly, but not significantly, less accurate than controls on the 20-item questionnaire. Weapon present subjects were correct on 45.8% of the items, while control (weapon absent) subjects were correct on 50.3% of the items, t(34) = 1.37, p > .05, one tailed.

1. What kind of study design is this (experimental or correlational)?

2. If experimental, what is the independent variable?

3. If experimental, what is the dependent variable?

4. What kind of statistical test did the author run, and how do you know the used this test?

5. What do you think the null and alternative hypotheses are in this study? You might have to guess, but make it an educated guesses!

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1. The study is an experimental design. This is because there is an indication of a control condition, a characteristic feature of experiments.

2. The independent variable is weapon presence.

3. The dependent variable is response accuracy. (What the questionnaire is measuring is not mentioned here)

4. A t test was used here to obtain the results. This is because differences between the two experimental conditions are compared. The results also report the value of the t statistic.

5. Null hypothesis: Weapon presence has no significant impact on response accuracy.

Alternative hypothesis: Weapon presence has a significant impact on response accuracy.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Subjects in the weapon condition were only slightly, but not significantly, less accurate than controls on...
Subjects in the weapon condition were only slightly, but not significantly, less accurate than controls on the 20-item questionnaire. Weapon present subjects were correct on 45.8% of the items, while control (weapon absent) subjects were correct on 50.3% of the items, t(34) = 1.37, p > .05, one tailed. 1. What kind of study design is this (experimental or correlational) 2. If experimental what is the independent and dependent variable 3. What kind of statistical test did the author run,...
The measure of cleaning behavior was subjected to a ______. Participants removed the crumbs substantially more...
The measure of cleaning behavior was subjected to a ______. Participants removed the crumbs substantially more often in the scent condition (M = 3.54) than in the control condition (M = 1.09), t(20) = 2.37, p = .02, thus showing a direct link between scent perception and behavior. What kind of study design is this (experimental or correlational)? If experimental, what is the independent variable? If experimental, what is the dependent variable? What kind of statistical test did the author...
The future-alone participants made fewer cooperative moves than did participants in other conditions, F(2, 28) =...
The future-alone participants made fewer cooperative moves than did participants in other conditions, F(2, 28) = 5.87, p < .01. Tukey’s HSD tests showed that the future-alone condition was significantly different from the other two conditions at p < .05 and that the future-belonging and no-feedback-control conditions were not significantly different from each other. Comparing the future-alone group with the other two groups yielded d = 1.31, a large effect. These results suggest that socially excluded individuals are still less...
To measure amount of violent video game play, participants were asked to name their three favorite...
To measure amount of violent video game play, participants were asked to name their three favorite video games, to indicate how often they play each video game (on a scale from 1 = sometimes to 7 = very often), and to rate how violent the content of each video game was (on a scale from 1=not at all to 7=very). As in previous research (e.g., Anderson & Dill, 2000; Greitemeyer, 2014), for each video game, the frequency of game play...
Regarding motivation for studying, the results were as expected. Self-oriented perfectionism showed positive correlations with autonomous...
Regarding motivation for studying, the results were as expected. Self-oriented perfectionism showed positive correlations with autonomous reasons for studying (intrinsic reasons and extrinsic reasons), and socially prescribed perfectionism showed positive correlations with controlled reasons (introjected reasons and extrinsic reasons). Whereas self-oriented perfectionism also showed a positive bivariate correlation with introjected reasons, this correlation became non-significant when partial correlations were regarded and the overlap between self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism was controlled for (see Table 2). Moreover, socially prescribed perfectionism showed...
As you saw from the lab PowerPoint slides last week, you will be doing a research...
As you saw from the lab PowerPoint slides last week, you will be doing a research study looking at ‘Aggression Priming” for your first paper. For this week’s discussion, I want you to discuss with your group what you think this study is about. What is the hypothesis? What theory does it come from? What do you predict will happen (do you expect something different than the hypothesis in the researcher instructions? If so, what and why?)? Do you think...
When is a hypothesis considered scientific? a. when it is based on something other than observation...
When is a hypothesis considered scientific? a. when it is based on something other than observation b. when it can be tested and is refutable c. when it relies on anecdotal evidence d. when it relies on mystical explanations e. All hypotheses are considered scientific until experiments determine otherwise. 3. Of the following, which is the earliest step in the scientific process? a. generating a hypothesis b. analyzing data c. conducting an experiment d. drawing a conclusion e. developing a...