Question

Assume for the sake of argument that a God exists. If this God is all knowing,...

Assume for the sake of argument that a God exists. If this God is all knowing, can there be free will? Discuss using examples and details

Social-Sciences   Psychology   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Yes, the free will do exist although we assume that a God exists. This is because, as per the religious scripts, God is omnipresent and knows everything, which means, God knows everything about the past, present and future, which does not change. Whatever the decision we make is our free will. For example, if I want to kill a snake, it is my free will and God knows that it happens. Thus, the free will does not change with an assumption of real existence of the God.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God assumes that a being that exists in reality...
Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God assumes that a being that exists in reality is greater than a being that exists only in the understanding. Explain how, on the basis of this reasoning, he “proves” that God exists.
This week one of the things that you thought about was the argument from mystical experiences...
This week one of the things that you thought about was the argument from mystical experiences for believing in God. This argument says that you can know that God exists simply by having an experience of Him in your heart. What do you think of this? Is it plausible or implausible?
3. Euthyphro’s dilemma is sometimes used to disprove the claim that an objective morality requires God....
3. Euthyphro’s dilemma is sometimes used to disprove the claim that an objective morality requires God. It is often phrased as follows: Is morality loved by God because it is good, or is it good because it is loved by God? If the first, then morality exists outside of God, which means that God is not necessary for its existence. If the latter, then morality changes upon the whim of God, which means that it is not constant or objective....
Determine all values of n for which the following statement is true: There exists integers x...
Determine all values of n for which the following statement is true: There exists integers x and y such that 63x + 147y = n. Give a convincing argument to justify your answer.
Write me a convincing argument that the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a “reasonable” or “good” measure...
Write me a convincing argument that the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a “reasonable” or “good” measure of inequality of the distribution of resources. To make your argument, you can use little numerical examples, or you can discuss the algebraic or geometric properties and behavior of HHI. Why does an increase in the sum of squared resource shares indicate an increase in inequality?
Identify one thing that God has clearly used or is clearly using now to refine and...
Identify one thing that God has clearly used or is clearly using now to refine and transform you. Describe your initial response to this thing in your life. Based on what you’ve been learning thus far in this course about motivation and change, discuss whether your initial response has changed at all.
Write a convincing argument that the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a “reasonable” or “good” measure of...
Write a convincing argument that the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a “reasonable” or “good” measure of inequality of the distribution of resources (be they wins, championships, gate revenues, player salaries, etc.) To make your argument, you can use little numerical examples, or you can discuss the algebraic or geometric properties and behavior of HHI. Why does an increase in the sum of squared resource shares indicate an increase in inequality?
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the...
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the conclusion is true as well. Create an equivalent definition that is the contrapositive of the definition above. 2.) Show that the following argument is valid without using a truth table. Instead, argue that the argument fulfills the equivalent definition for valid argument that you created in number (1) p→¬q r→(p∧q) ¬r
Discrete Mathematics (a) Consider the following argument: All honest people pay their taxes.                           &nbsp
Discrete Mathematics (a) Consider the following argument: All honest people pay their taxes.                                                               Darth is not honest. ∴ Darth does not pay his taxes. Write this argument in formal language using quantifiers, variables, and predicates (remember to define what your predicate means). Is this argument valid? If so, is it universal modus ponens or universal modus tollens? If not, does it exhibit converse error or inverse error? (b) Draw a diagram with disks (as shown in the text) to...
Discrete Mathematics (a) Consider the following argument: All honest people pay their taxes.                           &
Discrete Mathematics (a) Consider the following argument: All honest people pay their taxes.                                                            Darth is not honest. ∴ Darth does not pay his taxes. Write this argument in formal language using quantifiers, variables, and predicates (remember to define what your predicate means). Is this argument valid? If so, is it universal modus ponens or universal modus tollens? If not, does it exhibit converse error or inverse error? (b) Draw a diagram with disks (as shown in the text) to help...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT