Question

Specific, relevant, character traits of the accused may be introduced into evidence by the defense in...

Specific, relevant, character traits of the accused may be introduced into evidence by the defense in federal courts to prove that the accused acted in accordance with those traits. For instance, an accused who is charged with assault may introduce evidence in the form of opinion or reputation evidence to prove that the accused is a peaceful person, and, therefore, would not have committed the assault charged. How much weight do you believe that such evidence should have in determining whether the accused is guilty or not guilty? Explain your position.

Social-Sciences   Psychology   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Rules of Evidence Under the rules of evidence, a judge may exclude relevant evidence for a...
Rules of Evidence Under the rules of evidence, a judge may exclude relevant evidence for a variety of reasons. Which of the following is a situation where a judge can refuse to admit relevant evidence? The evidence is unduly prejudicial The evidence is hypothetical The evidence might be offensive The evidence is narrative ________________ is defined as anything perceptible by the fives senses and any proof legally presented at trial to prove a contested issue and induce a belief in...
1. Evidence that relates to, or bears directly upon, the point or fact in issue, and...
1. Evidence that relates to, or bears directly upon, the point or fact in issue, and proves or has a tendency to prove the proposition alleged, is relevant evidence. T OR F? 2. Evidence is legally material and admissible if it relates to a fact in issue and has only a slight bearing on the matter in issue. T OR F? 3. Photographic evidence of a gruesome crime scene may be admitted if it is probative of a fact in...
QUESTION 1 1.Mr. A is walking down a dark street; he hears footsteps behind him and...
QUESTION 1 1.Mr. A is walking down a dark street; he hears footsteps behind him and sees Mr. B. walking in the same direction. Mr. A, who has been diagnosed as Schizophrenic hears a voice telling him to kill Mr. B. believing that Mr. B intends to harm him, and not knowing right from wrong he pulls out a gun and kills Mr. B. who had done nothing to Mr. A. Mr. A’s defense may claim: Insanity Necessity Justification 4...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
Discuss how the respective organizations’ relations with stakeholders could have potentially been affected by the events...
Discuss how the respective organizations’ relations with stakeholders could have potentially been affected by the events that took place at Enron and how the situation could have been dealt with differently to prevent further damage? THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies,...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT