some social scientists claim that we cannot meaningfully discuss “religion”. Why do they say this, and what is a counter to this claim?
Social scientists makes this claim as religion, in totality, is a complex structure which is sowmthimes not based in facts but in lores and has a different set of observations and interpretations which can lead to a variation in its essentiality.
Of course, that is not entirely true and the discussion of religions can help gain an integral insight into human behavior and behavioral mechanism of sundry societies which are based on many religious aspects.
It can help understand and trace trends to help explain certain social institutions and phenomenons.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.