Question

Part 1, Argument Structure: Tell me which specific sentence you think is the main conclusion of the editorial (don't use the headline; be sure the sentence is from within the article because the authors don't actually write the headlines) Then tell me what reasons (premises) the author gives to support that conclusion. This summary of the structure of the argument should only be about a paragraph long, and I want you to quote directly from the article when you list the statements that you think are serving as the conclusion and the premises of the argument.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/20/opinion/prescription-drug-costs-naloxone-opioids.html

Answer 1

The crucial argument of the articles, in simplified terms is, that there is the section of 1498 that the federal government could use in order to get the pahramacetucial companies and the drug creators in on a way to providing cheap drugs at the cost of being compensated by the government, but that is based on the premise that the drug makers are fairly ready for the entire procedure

There is a Calle for a negotiation between the government and the companies for a way that the pharmecietucal companies keep earning their profit and the government is able to subsidize the costs of the drugs as well, which can be done by somehting known as the subscription model, which is one of the sundry prospects that the negotiation can create.