Question

Considering the principles identified in the code of conduct for psychologists by the American Psychological Association. How might Watson and Rayner, who conducted the famous “Little Albert” study, have designed a more ethical study of conditioned emotional responses (CERs)?

Answer 1

According to today's ethical standards, the nature of the study itself would be considered unethical, as it did not protect Albert from psychological harm, because its purpose was to induce a state of fear. Many sources claim that Little Albert was used as a subject in the study without the permission of his mother. Watson and Rayner should have obtained informed consent from the mother and explained the risks associated with the study before conducting it. Furthermore, it is also alleged that Albert was withdrawn from the hospital by his mother, which meant that there was no removal of negative effects caused by the study and Albert's psychological wellbeing following his experience has never been ascertained. The researchers should have conducted a debriefing and follow up session.