Question

This week you read an article from the New York Times Magazine about a tweet or two that went very wrong! Words are powerful. The reach of the Internet is powerful and it is important to realize that once you put it out there, it can potentially stay there, beyond your control. Justine Sacco made some tweets that changed her life forever. The article also portrays some other individuals who were victims of social media. As you post this week, address the following questions:

What is the moral of the story you have just read?

What is the lesson that you take away?

Is Justine Sacco the only one who behaved inappropriately in this situation?

Was she deserving of the outcome?

What about the other individuals whose stories are also portrayed?

As you answer these questions, keep in mind The 10 Core Rules of Netiquette (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that we examined.  Which rules were violated (tell me the number of the rule and how it was violated in this situation)? Use direct quotes from the article and/or the Netiquette website to support your responses in the discussion.

Answer 1

The moral of the story is Negative effects of technology or internet addiction .

The internet is a sweet poison once you are there it does not let you go .moreover hazards of internet grows slowly .it sucks blood slow and steady till the victim gets addicted. There should be proper management or schedule and proper use of it.

NO Justine sacco is not the only to behave inappropriately regarding this matter.

NO she was not deserving the outcome it was like a shock for her.

The other individuals also have the same story like that of Justine sacco. They are also the victims of internet.