Question

Which of the following is true of an analogical argument? 1. the premises are intended to...

Which of the following is true of an analogical argument?

1. the premises are intended to establish a moral principle

2. the premises are intended to guarantee the conclusion

3. analogical arguments are deductive

4. the premises do not guarantee the conclusion

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the...
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the conclusion is true as well. Create an equivalent definition that is the contrapositive of the definition above. 2.) Show that the following argument is valid without using a truth table. Instead, argue that the argument fulfills the equivalent definition for valid argument that you created in number (1) p→¬q r→(p∧q) ¬r
Please determine if this post is a sound or unsound deductive argument and explain why. Deductive...
Please determine if this post is a sound or unsound deductive argument and explain why. Deductive argument: My mother has a small dog. She is a teacup Pomeranian. Therefore, all small dogs are teacups. Do you think the argument is sound or unsound? My mother does have a small dog, thats true. She is a teacup, that's also true. So if both my premises are true that must mean my argument is valid, right? and if that is the case...
Philosophy 6.2 PD write a response to this passage Validity, consistency, and soundness are premises of...
Philosophy 6.2 PD write a response to this passage Validity, consistency, and soundness are premises of arguments in critical thinking. Validity is the premises of an argument that could be true. An argument is said to be valid if "it's impossible for all of the premises to be true while its conclusion is false" (Ancell, 2014). Consistency is the premise that the given claims are constant if logically possible for all the claims to be true at the same time....
1) Reconstruct the following argument (underline the conclusions, [bracket] and number the premises [P1, P2, etc..],...
1) Reconstruct the following argument (underline the conclusions, [bracket] and number the premises [P1, P2, etc..], write down the argument in standard form, supply any missing premises or conclusions (MP2, MC, etc.), and then DIAGRAM each argument using arrows (T-arguments, V-arguments, etc.). Kate speaks English, French, and German. All students should learn a second language because learning a second language enhances cognitive capabilities. It also makes other cultures accessible and broadens students’ horizons.
Choose one of the arguments listed below and to break it down into it's parts (premises...
Choose one of the arguments listed below and to break it down into it's parts (premises and conclusion), and determine whether it is and inductive or deductive argument. I would also like you to evaluate the argument for validity and impact. Remember, there may be missing information that must be inferred. Argument 1: "Candidate A is the best person for the job, because they have the most experience." Argument 2: "You should cover my shift on Saturday because it's my...
1. Some indicator words for premises are: Given that Because Since For All of these 2....
1. Some indicator words for premises are: Given that Because Since For All of these 2. According to the lecture, there are how many types of rhetoric? 1 type 2 types 3 types 4 types 3. Saying “Dearly Beloved…” is an example of which type of language? Informative language Expressive Language Directive Language Ceremonial Language 4. Who wrote a Critique of Pure Reason? Plato Aristotle John Stuart Mill Immanuel Kant 5. Higher-order thinking means that there is an active, intelligent...
T or F: In an inductive inference the truth of the premises does not guarantee the...
T or F: In an inductive inference the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. T or F: the argument for Cartesian skepticism involves the principle of the uniformity of nature. T or F: Nagel argues that we cannot imagine what it is like to be a bat. T or F: The statement “1+2+3” expresses a relation of ideas (according to Hume). T or F: According to Jackson, epiphenomenal qualia can casually influence our brain.
3. For the following analogical argument, (1) what is the premise or premises, (2) what is...
3. For the following analogical argument, (1) what is the premise or premises, (2) what is the conclusion, (3) what is the analogy, (4) what are the properties mentioned, (5) is the argument strong or weak? Explain why.     Master Kao said, “Men’s nature is like a current of water. If you open a channel for the current to the east, it will flow east. If you open a channel to the west, it will flow west. Men’s nature makes...
All questions below are True or False: 1. One of the basic premises of feminism is...
All questions below are True or False: 1. One of the basic premises of feminism is that the oppression of women by men is morally undesirable and should be brought to an end. 2. Sally Markowitz claims that a rights-based argument regarding abortion is a genuine feminist argument because it is gender neutral. 3. According to Sally Markowitz, the "Impermissible Sacrifice Principle" means that disadvantaged groups should not be required to make any kinds of sacrifices. 4. According to Sally...
Rewrite the following statement in the form ∀x ________, if _________ then _________. Every valid argument...
Rewrite the following statement in the form ∀x ________, if _________ then _________. Every valid argument with true premises has a true conclusion.