Question

Give original examples of valid arguments that have: (i) all true premises and a true conclusion,...

Give original examples of valid arguments that have: (i) all true premises and a true conclusion, (ii) all false premises and a true conclusion, (iii) all false premises and a false conclusion, (iv) mixed premises and a true conclusion, and (v) mixed premises and a false conclusion.

Social-Sciences   Psychology   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(i) All true premises and a true conclusion: All human beings are mortal. Socrates is a human being. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

(ii) All false premises and a true conclusion: All birds can fly. All bats are birds. Therefore bats can fly.

(iii) All false premises and a false conclusion: Brian Lara is a horrible cricketer. Sahin Tendulkar is a horrible cricketer. Therefore, Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara are the same people.

(iv) Mixed premises and a true conclusion: All cats have four feet. All mammals have four feet. Therefore, cats are mammals.

Please post the other questions separately as we are supposed to answer just one question or four subparts of a question

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the...
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the conclusion is true as well. Create an equivalent definition that is the contrapositive of the definition above. 2.) Show that the following argument is valid without using a truth table. Instead, argue that the argument fulfills the equivalent definition for valid argument that you created in number (1) p→¬q r→(p∧q) ¬r
Philosophy 6.2 PD write a response to this passage Validity, consistency, and soundness are premises of...
Philosophy 6.2 PD write a response to this passage Validity, consistency, and soundness are premises of arguments in critical thinking. Validity is the premises of an argument that could be true. An argument is said to be valid if "it's impossible for all of the premises to be true while its conclusion is false" (Ancell, 2014). Consistency is the premise that the given claims are constant if logically possible for all the claims to be true at the same time....
Which of the following statement(s) is/are TRUE? (i) In INDUCTION (Inductive Reasoning), we derive the conclusion...
Which of the following statement(s) is/are TRUE? (i) In INDUCTION (Inductive Reasoning), we derive the conclusion from the Universal fact. (ii) In an empirical study (applied research), it is difficult to draw a definite conclusion because of possibilities of errors at different stages of research. (iii) Replicability implies that the results of the test of research objectives should be supported again and again when same type of research is being repeated in other, similar circumstances (iv) Longitudinal research design is...
Which of the following are true? I. All enzymes are highly specific for the reactions they...
Which of the following are true? I. All enzymes are highly specific for the reactions they catalyze. II. Prosthetic groups are loosely associated with the polypeptide chain of an enzyme III. When comparing types of catalysis, the proximity effect provide the largest rate enhancement IV. Acid-base catalysis involves proton transfers. A. I, II, III and IV B. I, III C. I D. III E. IV Appreciate the help!
Which of the following are examples of diversifiable risk? I. An earthquake damages an entire town...
Which of the following are examples of diversifiable risk? I. An earthquake damages an entire town II. The federal government imposes a $100 fee on all business entities III. Employment taxes increase nationally IV. All toymakers are required to improve their safety standards A. I and IV only B. II and IV only C. I and III only D. I, III, and IV only
Consider the following processes (treat all gases as ideal). I. The pressure of 1 mole of...
Consider the following processes (treat all gases as ideal). I. The pressure of 1 mole of oxygen gas is allowed to double at constant temperature. II. Carbon dioxide is allowed to expand at constant temperature to 10 times its original volume. III. The temperature of 1 mol of helium is increased 25 degrees C at constant pressure. IV. Nitrogen gas is compressed at constant temperature to half its original volume. V. A glass of water loses 100 J of energy...
Part IV: All of the following arguments are VALID. Prove the validity of each using NATURAL...
Part IV: All of the following arguments are VALID. Prove the validity of each using NATURAL DEDUCTION. 1) 1. H É I 2. U v ~I 3. ~U 4. H v S                                               / S 2) 1. (I × E) É (F É Y) 2. Y É ~C 3. I × E                                                 / F É ~C 3) 1. L v O 2. (F v C) É B 3. L É F 4. O É C                                              / B 4) 1. K ×...
Sorry, this is all the info I have on this problem, I have. If you cannot...
Sorry, this is all the info I have on this problem, I have. If you cannot do it please cancel/refund the question so we both can save time :) 1. A customer has received a Regulation T margin call. She can meet the call by depositing into her account which of the following? I. Listed stock with a market value equal to the amount of the call II. Cash equal to the amount of the call III. Unlisted marginable stock...
1. Some indicator words for premises are: Given that Because Since For All of these 2....
1. Some indicator words for premises are: Given that Because Since For All of these 2. According to the lecture, there are how many types of rhetoric? 1 type 2 types 3 types 4 types 3. Saying “Dearly Beloved…” is an example of which type of language? Informative language Expressive Language Directive Language Ceremonial Language 4. Who wrote a Critique of Pure Reason? Plato Aristotle John Stuart Mill Immanuel Kant 5. Higher-order thinking means that there is an active, intelligent...
In each case below show that the statement is True or give an example showing that...
In each case below show that the statement is True or give an example showing that it is False. (i) If {X, Y } is independent in R n, then {X, Y, X + Y } is independent. (ii) If {X, Y, Z} is independent in R n, then {Y, Z} is independent. (iii) If {Y, Z} is dependent in R n, then {X, Y, Z} is dependent. (iv) If A is a 5 × 8 matrix with rank A...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT