If we did away with prejudice and nothing else, what would happen to the occupational structure and division of labor in the society?
everyone would become middle class and there would no longer be a working class.
nothing really since the jobs that exist now would still exist then
the upper class would cease to exist
inter-racial marriages would diminish
none of the above
Economist Lester Thurow, cited in Core Concepts with respect to social class, explained that “Once wealth is accumulated, opportunities to make more money multiply, since accumulated wealth tends to lead to income-earning opportunities that are not open to those without wealth.” Sociologists refer to this phenomenon as
the rags to riches effect |
||||||||
the Abraham Lincoln syndrome |
||||||||
the Matthew Effect |
||||||||
the culture of poverty process |
||||||||
None of the above In Mary Pardo’s “Grassroots Activism: Mothers of East Los Angeles” the subject is primarily about how middle and upper socioeconomic strata are much better at organizing themselves than lower SES are.
Functionalists assume that people are naturally unequal AND that this natural inequality explains why we now have social classes and other forms of social inequality. True False |
1. The correct answer is Option B. If we did away with prejudice, nothing really would happen and the jobs that exist now would exist then as well.
2. The correct answer is Option C. This phenomenon is referred to as the Matthew effect.
3. False. The subject of the book is not primarily about how middle and upper socioeconomic strata are much better at organising themselves than lower SES are.
4. True. Functionalism makes these assumptions with respect to social inequality.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.