Is the lack of deductive necessity a strength or a weakness for a scientific theory? Why? When the phrase, “just a theory” is used to describe science, is it accurate? Why or why not?
The basic feature of science is its objectivity and validity. This is based on the facts that has been proved by deductivity. Hence, if aa scientific theory lack this feature of being deductive, it is a weakness for it, as it will make the scientific theory unreliable and invalid.
The theories of science are not wild guesses or assumptions, but they are explanations of facts that by thorough research and studies are proved, and by which the future can be predicted. Hence, it is inaccurate to describe the theories of science by the phrase "just a theory".
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.