Question

Using the Friedmann equation along with the definition of q, show that the deceleration parameter q...

Using the Friedmann equation along with the definition of q, show that the deceleration parameter q is equal to 1/2 for a k = 0 standard universe. (This requires some algebra.)

Science   Advanced-Physics   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
(Linear Algebra) Consider the difference equation. yk+2 - 4yk+1 + 4yk = 0, for all k...
(Linear Algebra) Consider the difference equation. yk+2 - 4yk+1 + 4yk = 0, for all k (a) After using auxiliary equation, the solutions have the form rk and k(rk). Find the root, r, and show that yk = k(rk) is a solution. (b) Show that rk and k(rk) are linearly independent and form the general solution of the difference equation.
Eliminate the parameter to find the cartesian equation. Then sketch the curve using t= 0, 90,180...
Eliminate the parameter to find the cartesian equation. Then sketch the curve using t= 0, 90,180 degrees Given; x= 2cost -2 and y= sint + 1
Let p and q be two real numbers with p > 0. Show that the equation...
Let p and q be two real numbers with p > 0. Show that the equation x^3 + px +q= 0 has exactly one real solution. (Hint: Show that f'(x) is not 0 for any real x and then use Rolle's theorem to prove the statement by contradiction)
Using the definition (must show the calculation) prove that the Laplace transform of e^t t is...
Using the definition (must show the calculation) prove that the Laplace transform of e^t t is 1/(s-1)^2
3. Use the definition of a limit (Definition 3.1.1) to show the following: (a) limx→2 (x...
3. Use the definition of a limit (Definition 3.1.1) to show the following: (a) limx→2 (x 2 + 2x − 5) = 3 (b) limx→1 (x 3 + 2x + 1) = 4 (c) limx→0 (x 3 sin(e x 2 )) = 0
On page 51 we showed that a one-parameter family of solutions of the first-order differential equation...
On page 51 we showed that a one-parameter family of solutions of the first-order differential equation dy/dx=xy^(1/2) is y=((1/4)x^4+c)^2 for c>=0. Each solution in this family is defined on (-inf,inf). The last statement is not true if we choose c to be negative. For c=-1, explain why y=((1/4)x^4+c)^2 is not a solution of the DE on the interval (-inf,inf). Find an interval of definition I on which y=((1/4)x^4+c)^2 is a solution of the DE.
Solve the differential equation by using variation of parameter method y^''+3y^'+2y = 1/(1+e^2x)
Solve the differential equation by using variation of parameter method y^''+3y^'+2y = 1/(1+e^2x)
For these two problems, use the definition of eigenvalues. (a) An n × n matrix is...
For these two problems, use the definition of eigenvalues. (a) An n × n matrix is said to be nilpotent if Ak = O for some positive integer k. Show that all eigenvalues of a nilpotent matrix are 0. (b) An n × n matrix is said to be idempotent if A2 = A. Show that all eigenvalues of a idempotent matrix are 0, or 1.
(a) verfiy that y=tan(x+c) ia a one parameter family of solutions of the differential equation y'=...
(a) verfiy that y=tan(x+c) ia a one parameter family of solutions of the differential equation y'= 1+x^2 (b)since f(x,y)= 1+y^2 and df/dy= 2y are continuous everywhere, the region R can be taken to be the entire xy-plane. Use the family of solutions in part A to find an explicit solution of the first order initial value problem y'= 1+y^2, y(0)=0. Even though x0=0 is in the interval (-2,2) explain why the solution is not defined on its interval (c)determine the...
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the...
1.) The definition of valid argument is as follows. Whenever the premises are all true, the conclusion is true as well. Create an equivalent definition that is the contrapositive of the definition above. 2.) Show that the following argument is valid without using a truth table. Instead, argue that the argument fulfills the equivalent definition for valid argument that you created in number (1) p→¬q r→(p∧q) ¬r
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT