Question

Compute the rise time of a photo detector if its 3-dB bandwidth is 250 MHz.

Compute the rise time of a photo detector if its 3-dB bandwidth is 250 MHz.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Rise Time is the time required for the photodetector output level to change from 10% to 90% of the peak output level.

The frequency at which the detector output power decreases by 3dB from the output at 100kHz is called cutoff frequency.

Bandwidth: The difference between the high and low cutoff frequencies, measured in Hertz. The bandwidth of the photodetector is approximately related to the rise time (Tr) by:

           Bandwidth (Hz) ≈ 0.35/Tr

Therefore, rise time, Tr = 0.35/250MHz = 1.4 ns

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Discuss the connection between rise-time and bandwidth in amplifier circuits.
Discuss the connection between rise-time and bandwidth in amplifier circuits.
Problem 3: Nyquist Theorem (10 pts) With 32 levels of signal and a bandwidth f=1 MHz,...
Problem 3: Nyquist Theorem (10 pts) With 32 levels of signal and a bandwidth f=1 MHz, what is the maximum data rate by the Nyquist theorem? Please include your calculation steps. Answers without intermediate work will not receive any point. (Hint: Nyquist theorem in Ch02 slides# 56) Your solution: Data rate = 2 * 1mhz * log2(32) = 2* 1 Mhz * 5 =10 bps Can someone check my work if i did this correctly? thank you
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1010 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. A sample of 19 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1000 feet with a standard deviation of 34 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
Digital Technology wishes to determine its coefficient of variation as a company over time. The firm...
Digital Technology wishes to determine its coefficient of variation as a company over time. The firm projects the following data (in millions of dollars): Year Profits: Expected Value Standard Deviation 1 $ 99 $ 39 3 146 63 6 221 112 9 250 158 a. Compute the coefficient of variation (V) for each time period. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places.) Year Coefficient of Variation 1 3 6 9 b. Does the risk (V) appear to be increasing over...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1050 feet with a standard deviation of 40 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let µ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1150 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 7 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1919 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 11101110 feet with a standard deviation of 2222 feet. A sample of 1111 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 10601060 feet with a standard deviation of 2323 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1111 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 13901390 feet with a standard deviation of 3333 feet. A sample of 2020 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 13601360 feet with a standard deviation of 3030 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1240 feet with a standard deviation of 24 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 28 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let ?1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 8 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1300 feet with a standard deviation of 43 feet. A sample of 14 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1280 feet with a standard deviation of 36 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...