Question

Would it be possible for an object to have acceleration greater than zero and to be...

Would it be possible for an object to have acceleration greater than zero and to be at rest at the same time? Explain.  

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer : Yes.

Because, motion is always relative to something else. There is no “absolute” frame of reference.

For example, If you’re standing in an elevator - you’re at rest relative to the elevator, and being accelerated up/down relative to the earth as the elevator moves you. It’s all about view point.. and no single view is special.

A simple example is you sitting there reading this. You are both at rest sitting in your chair in your room in your house in your city or wherever, on the planet Earth. And, you are spinning through the universe at what, some farfetched number when you add up all the motions. Why do you ask this? It is not a special case, it is the most normal thing.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Which one of the following statements is not possible? An object has zero velocity and non-zero...
Which one of the following statements is not possible? An object has zero velocity and non-zero acceleration An object travels with a northward velocity and a northward acceleration An object travels with a constant velocity and a constant non-zero acceleration An object travels with a changing velocity and a constant acceleration              ____________ In a displacement vs. time graph, a sloped (non-horizontal) line indicates: The object is moving with constant, non-zero, acceleration The total displacement of the object is zero...
Is it possible for an object in uniform circular motion to have nonzero tangential yet zero...
Is it possible for an object in uniform circular motion to have nonzero tangential yet zero centripetal acceleration? explain
Only one force acts on an object. Can the object have zero acceleration? Can the object...
Only one force acts on an object. Can the object have zero acceleration? Can the object have zero velocity? Explain can I get a step by step process please.
If the instantaneous velocity is zero, but the acceleration is non-zero, the object is said to...
If the instantaneous velocity is zero, but the acceleration is non-zero, the object is said to be speeding up. True of False ?
Two objects are at rest on a frictionless surface. Object 1 has a greater mass than...
Two objects are at rest on a frictionless surface. Object 1 has a greater mass than object 2. When a force is applied to object 1, it accelerates for a time interval ∆t. The force is removed from object 1 and is applied to object 2. After object 2 has accelerated for the same time interval ∆t, which statements are true? (a) p1 < p2 (b) p1 = p2 (c) p1 > p2 (d) KE1 < KE2 (e) KE1 =...
does an object have greater density in the air than if it submerged in the water?
does an object have greater density in the air than if it submerged in the water?
object of mass 17.0-kg subjected to a non-zero net force moves with an acceleration of (5.00î...
object of mass 17.0-kg subjected to a non-zero net force moves with an acceleration of (5.00î − 5.00ĵ) m/s2. (a) Determine the magnitude and direction of the net force acting on it. magnitude 106 Incorrect: Your answer is incorrect. As per Newton's second law what is the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration? N direction 45 Incorrect: Your answer is incorrect. Review rules governing components of a vector.° counterclockwise from the +x axis (b) What acceleration would a 59.5-kg object...
If interest rates are greater than zero, presents goods have a greater, less or equal value...
If interest rates are greater than zero, presents goods have a greater, less or equal value compared to future goods
You are told that an object has zero acceleration. Two forces on the object are: F_1...
You are told that an object has zero acceleration. Two forces on the object are: F_1 has magnitude 2.4 N at 45 degrees above the +x-axis and F_2 has magnitude 4.8 N at 37 degrees below the -x-axis. What is the third force that must be acting on the object?
Please explain if these examples would be possible. e. constant velocity, constant acceleration, and constant displacement...
Please explain if these examples would be possible. e. constant velocity, constant acceleration, and constant displacement f. acceleration (vector) is non constant and constant (scalar) acceleration g. non constant acceleration and constant non zero velocity
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT