James Sullivan, the firm’s general manager, is approached by a supplier of #3925 valves offering quantity discounts, ultimately forcing a ‘Make vs. Buy’ decision: continue in-house production/sourcing or contract with the supplier in question (i.e., outsource). Accordingly, he must determine both the quantity and method of delivery (i.e., either orders received gradually or orders received all at once) for one material. And, consequently, determine if the valves should continue to be made in-house or out-sourced.
Mike Wazowski develops the following estimates from accounting information:
Annual Demand = 10,000 valves per year
Cost per valve = $1.60
Annual Inventory Holding Rate = 25%
Ordering Cost (per order) = $5.50
Working Days per Year = 250
The supplier’s quantity discount schedule is:
Range of Order Quantities Discount % Unit Cost
1 to 399 0% $1.70
400 to 699 4% $1.632
700+ 6.75% $1.585
Annual Demand, D = 10,000 valves per year
Cost per valve, C = $1.60
Annual Inventory Holding Rate = 25%
Holding cost, H = 1.6*0.25 = 0.4
Ordering Cost (per order), S = $5.50
Working Days per Year = 250
EOQ = SQRT(2DS/H) = SQRT(2*10000*5.5/0.4) = 524
Annual cost of EOQ policy = Ordering cost + Holding cost + Purchase cost = (D/Q)*S + (Q/2)*H + D*C
= (10000/524)*5.5 + (524/2)*0.4 + 10000*1.6
= $ 16,210
For next quantity slab, Q=700, Unit cost = 1.585
Holding cost, H = 1.585*0.25 = 0.3963
Annual cost = Ordering cost + Holding cost + Purchase cost = (D/Q)*S + (Q/2)*H + D*C
= (10000/700)*5.5 + (700/2)*0.3963 + 10000*1.585
= $ 16,067
Total cost of order policy of Q=700 is lower. Therefore, they should order in lots of 700
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.