Question

When the terms of a written agreement are clear, and there is no fraud or deceit,...

When the terms of a written agreement are clear, and there is no fraud or deceit, the parol evidence rule bars oral evidence that contradicts those terms. a. True b. False

Homework Answers

Answer #1

True.

Explanation :

It has a simple explanation that oral evidence is only permissible when the written contracts is not clear, or there exists ambiguity, or the changes are made after the contract was written. As the question states ,agreement is clear, hence parole evidence rule bars oral evidence of varying or contradicting terms.

Note :Parol evidence rule is the rule that states what kind of evidence can be allowed for introduction in situations of contract disputes.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
There is no difference between the breach of a promise and the failure, or non-happening of...
There is no difference between the breach of a promise and the failure, or non-happening of a condition: they are the same. TRUE OR FALSE Each term or provision of a contract is interpreted and construed separately. TRUE OR FALSE The theory of the parol evidence rule is the parties to a written contract will expressly state all terms in their contract. TRUE OR FALSE
3. Which of the following is excluded by the parol evidence rule? Testimony by a party...
3. Which of the following is excluded by the parol evidence rule? Testimony by a party to an oral contract about the prior negotiations in order to contradict an unambiguous term. A written agreement relating to the same transaction that was executed after the written contract in dispute was signed. An email exchange by the parties to a written agreement dated prior to the date of execution of the contract in dispute in order to modify an unambiguous term. An...
In terms of fraud detection Practice Advisory 1210.A2-2 makes clear the difference between management and internal...
In terms of fraud detection Practice Advisory 1210.A2-2 makes clear the difference between management and internal audit’s roles. Please explain the differences and how an internal auditor takes the role in respect of frauds.
Amy owned a small cafe. Smoking was allowed in restaurants in those days, and a salesman,...
Amy owned a small cafe. Smoking was allowed in restaurants in those days, and a salesman, Mike, convinced her that if she leased a cigarette machine from him, it would add to her profits because people liked to smoke after or before a meal. She leased the machine but the amount of cigarettes she sold did not cover the cost of the lease. She refused to pay the lease and terminated the agreement. She claimed the Mike had promised she...
1. Writings that are incorporated by reference into a written contract include: a. only writings that...
1. Writings that are incorporated by reference into a written contract include: a. only writings that are physically attached to the written contract. b. writings that the written contract identifies and declares to be part of the written contract. c. writings that are excluded from the written contract by the parol evidence rule. d. only writings that are made after the written contract has been executed 2 A written agreement satisfies the requirements of the statute of frauds if it:...
1. Heavyweight boxers Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield met in 1997 in Las Vegas for a...
1. Heavyweight boxers Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield met in 1997 in Las Vegas for a championship match. During the third round of the fight, a desperate Tyson bit off a piece of Holyfield's ear. The fight continued until moments later when Tyson bit Holyfield's other ear. Tyson was disqualified. Some fans were so outraged that they sued Tyson and the fight promoters seeking a refund. They sued on the basis of, among other theories, a claim to being third-party...
64.    Under the UCC if Anthony transfers the right to possession and use of goods for...
64.    Under the UCC if Anthony transfers the right to possession and use of goods for a term in return for consideration to Betty this would be a a. transfer b. lease c. gift d. sale e. nothing, this would not be covered by the UCC 65.    A ________ is a corporation in which the shares are held by one shareholder or a small group of shareholders and the stock is not actively traded. a. close corporation b. small corporation...
64.    Under the UCC if Anthony transfers the right to possession and use of goods for...
64.    Under the UCC if Anthony transfers the right to possession and use of goods for a term in return for consideration to Betty this would be a a. transfer b. lease c. gift d. sale e. nothing, this would not be covered by the UCC 65.    A ________ is a corporation in which the shares are held by one shareholder or a small group of shareholders and the stock is not actively traded. a. close corporation b. small corporation...
A forensic accountant conducting a fraud examination must follow GAAP when presenting the subject's financial data....
A forensic accountant conducting a fraud examination must follow GAAP when presenting the subject's financial data. a. True b. False Please explain the reason why you chose your answer. Thanks!
I not clear on what happens when business assets are disposed of after being written off...
I not clear on what happens when business assets are disposed of after being written off early. The accelerated depreciation gets rid of the salvage value of an asset on the books. The company still has the asset though. Can someone please expalin this.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT