Question

Mr. A had been diagnosed with a rare and aggressive cancer and was admitted currently unresponsive. He has a grown son and has been estranged from his common law partner for more than 10 years. Mr. A is now in hospice at your facility and a conflict has arisen in that his son reports his father “always wanted to die at home without aggressive treatment”, while his common law partner insists that Mr. A was “always a fighter and always refused to give up”

Assignment:

Select one of the following three ethical scenarios and prepare a 2 page paper discussing the ethical principles and considerations for this elderly or disabled individual.

Outline for your paper:

1.     Identify your chosen scenario and then identify and describe the ethical principles in conflict (i.e. autonomy, beneficence, etc.).

Answer 1

In this condition taking a gander at the components that Mr. A was antagonized with the customary law accomplice since most recent 10 years. In this condition the illness is unrecoverable and installment for the explicit sort of condition is additionally not clear. As there are no odds of recuperation because of the overabundance of malignant growth and forceful nature of the disease, examining the era that is spent by the child where is father give satisfactory dimension of trust on his announcement. By taking a gander at the idea of the issue and in general conditions I would state that running with custom-based law accomplice would be sufficient. As not giving treatment is never a moral condition for an explicit situation, treating the patient would be the most sufficient structure of activity that could be executed in the separate condition.