Question

SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension...

SCENARIO BACKGROUND:
The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension between the U.S. and Canada leaders, prompted many American analysts and politicians to weigh pros and cons and predict likely economic of closer integration in North America.

While most agree a US-Mexico union would have outweighing negative consequences for the US at this stage, primarily because of the great economic, political, societal and cultural differences between the countries, there is no consensus on the likely outcomes of a US-Canada union. Opinions range from “it would be a great economic success” to “it would ruin economies of both countries”.

The President and his administration do not see a US-Canada union as a likely scenario for the nearest future, but the government strategies have to consider and be prepared for any scenario, no matter how unlikely it may seem.

As a person knowledgeable in the area of the effects of government interventions in trade and regional integration, you are one of many experts invited by the Strategy Division of the Presidential Advisory Board to provide your visions on the likely consequences of a US-Canada Union. The scenario is planned for an economic union (common currency, taxes, laws and regulations, economic and foreign trade policies, unrestricted within-union trade and employment, central parliament, etc.) though a possibility of a political union is also considered.

The task is to predict the likely consequences of such a union, the two countries essentially becoming one, on public opinion, prices, internal and external trade, employment, investments, revenues and consumption. It is made very clear that your opinion must be rooted in existing economic theory covered in MGT 301. There are five questions (see template on the next page): If the US and Canada were to become one country, how would that likely affect the following domains of life?

Note: Please keep in mind that even though Canada and the U.S. are currently in a free-trade zone, there are many administrative, monetary, and political barriers to trade. For example, the traders must deal with the uncertainties and costs of currency exchange, the need to do separate certification in each territory, differences in taxes and other issues. So the trade between, for example, Montana and Alberta is still much harder than, for example, between North Carolina and Virginia.

The proposed scenario assumes a political union and removal of all trade barriers.

Note: The questions are about the changes in what today is the U.S. (will it affect the variety of products, prices, wages, unemployment and so far in the U.S. part of the new country).
However, the assumption is that the effect will be the same for both parts of the new country. If you believe that the effect will be different, you can explain it, though such differentiation is not required.

1. (10%, Production)

Based on your answers to the earlier questions,

What is the likely effect on the production volume?
That is, how will the volume of cumulative production of products change?

Group of answer choices

Increase

Remain the same

Decline

2. Please explain the mechanism that will improve/reduce production

3. (15%, Employment)

Based on your answers to the earlier questions,

What is the likely effect on employment?

Group of answer choices

Increase (more people working)

Remain the same

Decline (fewer people working)

4. Please explain the mechanism that will improve/reduce employment

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer:-

1)

In my opinion,the mechanism of US Canada Union will bring about increment in production.

2)

This is a result of the expansion in exchange between the countries.Although by and by these nations are a piece of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement),as examined above there are still obstructions as administrative,monetary (like outside trade bite the dust to various currencies,etc.,),tax regulations,political issues and so forth.,

In the event that an association happens it will receive the rewards like that of the part nations in the European Union - One Currency,unified monetary and finacial systems,job creation,employment,almost no movement restrictions,etc.,

So,in a nushell the production increments in light of the fact that the interest increments as the exchange limitations stop.

3)

As I would see it, Increase in Employment i.e more individuals working.

4)

As US and Canda structure an organization, it will profit firms in the two nations. Firms in the two nations can misuse their similar favorable position which will prompt productivity in production. Consequently, firms can cut cost and become progressively beneficial which will permit them to recruit more laborers and increment employment. Numerous organizations additionally have worldwide flexibly chain where they import a portion of their crude materials from the other nation.

These movies will profit by organized commerce and the expulsion of any taxes. The market for firms will likewise extend as it is simpler to send out theor produce so they have a greater interest to take into account that can build benefits and make it more for the organizations to grow and employ more.

Association - >More Trade- - > More Demand- - >More Production- - >More employment/Investment

Please please like the answer. . ,......

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension...
SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension between the U.S. and Canada leaders, prompted many American analysts and politicians to weigh pros and cons and predict likely economic of closer integration in North America. While most agree a US-Mexico union would have outweighing negative consequences for the US at this stage, primarily because of the great economic, political, societal and cultural differences between the countries, there is no consensus on the...
SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension...
SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension between the U.S. and Canada leaders, prompted many American analysts and politicians to weigh pros and cons and predict likely economic of closer integration in North America. While most agree a US-Mexico union would have outweighing negative consequences for the US at this stage, primarily because of the great economic, political, societal and cultural differences between the countries, there is no consensus on the...
SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension...
SCENARIO BACKGROUND: The controversy surrounding the European Union, as well as the recent increase in tension between the U.S. and Canada leaders, prompted many American analysts and politicians to weigh pros and cons and predict likely economic of closer integration in North America. While most agree a US-Mexico union would have outweighing negative consequences for the US at this stage, primarily because of the great economic, political, societal and cultural differences between the countries, there is no consensus on the...
QUESTION 1 A benefit of being part of a customs union (relative to not being in...
QUESTION 1 A benefit of being part of a customs union (relative to not being in the customs union) is, a. being in a customs union makes it more likely that firms can achieve economies of scale b. a customs union tends to have more bargaining power in trade agreements than a country has by itself c. both A and B d. neither A nor B QUESTION 2 A key difference between a customs union and a free trade area...
Under a common market agreement, you would find Multiple Choice absence of a common external trade...
Under a common market agreement, you would find Multiple Choice absence of a common external trade policy with regard to nonmembers. free movement of factors of production between member nations. establishment of barriers to the free flow of goods between member nations. a lack of administrative machinery to oversee trade relations with nonmembers. mandatory use of a common currency among member nations. Which of these situations shows how concerns over national sovereignty can act as an impediment to regional economic...
Hello, I am trying to do a critical analysis of the article below using economic or...
Hello, I am trying to do a critical analysis of the article below using economic or microeconomic concepts and tools. Please can you read the article and tell me the key ideas of the article that can be helpful and the concepts ( or themes) on microeconomic that I can use to do the critical analysis of those ideas? Thanks Economists Worry a Trade War Could Derail U.S. Growth Forecasters surveyed by The Wall Street Journal predict healthy growth in...
Mexico’s automobile industry is booming. Bolstered by $19 billion in new investment from foreign carmakers, including...
Mexico’s automobile industry is booming. Bolstered by $19 billion in new investment from foreign carmakers, including Nissan, Honda, Volkswagen, and Mazda, vehicle production doubled between 2009 and 2014 to an estimated 3.2 million vehicles. This investment surge has transformed Mexico into the eighth-largest automaker in the world, and it’s not over yet. In 2014 and 2015, Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai-Kia, BMW, and Volkswagen all outlined plans to build new state-of-the-art factories in Mexico. Audi is also constructing a $1.3 billion factory...
Mexico’s automobile industry is booming. Bolstered by $19 billion in new investment from foreign carmakers, including...
Mexico’s automobile industry is booming. Bolstered by $19 billion in new investment from foreign carmakers, including Nissan, Honda, Volkswagen, and Mazda, vehicle production doubled between 2009 and 2014 to an estimated 3.2 million vehicles. This investment surge has transformed Mexico into the eighth-largest automaker in the world, and it’s not over yet. In 2014 and 2015, Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai-Kia, BMW, and Volkswagen all outlined plans to build new state-of-the-art factories in Mexico. Audi is also constructing a $1.3 billion factory...
In fall 1993, President Clinton was lobbying hard for passage of NAFTA but facing tough opposition...
In fall 1993, President Clinton was lobbying hard for passage of NAFTA but facing tough opposition from Ross Perot, among others. To help get out the administration’s message and build congressional and popular support, Vice President Al Gore agreed to go on CNN’s Larry King Live to debate—and discredit—the Texas billionaire. During the debate, Al Gore talked about the critical importance of NAFTA to the future of the United States. ‘‘This is a major choice for our country of historic...
6) When a country does not meet the requirements of the SGP, it is declared in...
6) When a country does not meet the requirements of the SGP, it is declared in excessive deficit by the Council. What is the sanction imposed Select one: a. Fine of 0.2 per cent of the delinquent’s GDP. Resources are frozen until the procedure is lifted b. Fine of 0.5 per cent of the delinquent’s GDP, and an additional 0.2 per cent of GDP for further non-compliance c. Fine of 0.5 per cent of the delinquent’s GDP. Resources are frozen...