Question

Public Personnel Administration: Please answer in at least 250 words. Organizational appraisal systems typically focus on functional rationality; supervisors, however, tend to emphasize substantive rationality by filling false-but effective- evaluations. Under what circumstances can inaccurate reviews be examples of sound management? Are any of these reasons unethical? Why? Thank you for your help!

Answer 1

Organisational appraisal systems digitally focusing on overall capabilities of an individual as well as the level of completed task in the organisation rather than looking at the factors which involves qualitative approach rather than being quantitative. The specific systems uses quantitative to select the data on the basis of the opportunities being provided by the specific organisation.

Incorrect evaluations or incorrect reviews obtained by performance or organisational appraisal systems directly indicate that the management is looking forward to improve ethical standards of the organisation which is a resulting in some of the negative reviews done by organisational appraisal systems. Another great capability is the Change management system that is usually involved in the operation capability of an organisation that provide information regarding the specific effect of functional rationality and wrong reviews in the respective environment.

All of these activities create a void in the functional capabilities of organisational appraisal system which can create negative reviews on the system based structure but these specific reviews are indirect indication of a sound management working towards betterment of the organisation in terms of increasing the overall serviceability and quality of the management in the specific organisation. These indications and proper assessment are essential to understand that sometimes qualitative terms incremented in the structure have changed the outcome of the organisation appraisal systems which directory relies on the functional reliability.