Question

2-3 paragraph response. Choose one:

What are some reasons why our ethical obligations to ourselves may lead us to protect the natural world? What is the difference between protecting the natural world because we humans are valuable and because animals are valuable?

Explain the marketplace argument in favor of the right for workers to strike. How could a union worker ethically justify not joining companions on the picket lines?

Answer 1

Here, I have considered first question,

There are several reasons that our ethical obligations to ourselves may lead us to protect the natural world, these are as stated below:

• With ethical obligations, we could perform such duties that don’t create any harm on public and natural world, here; we have considered sustainability of our business and environment. Such obligations are highly necessary as we need to depend on each other to live a better life, again, we need to save the planet and support such activities that bring more meaning and usefulness for us.
• Again, we need to protect natural world, as with imbalances in natural world, we could see many crisis and devastations like forest fire, birds and other animal extinction. There could also be issues of pollution that could put negative impact on local people and animal. Hence, we need to keep our ethical obligations as to resist such uncertainties.

We must protect natural world, because we humans are valuable, here, we will only consider the interest of human beings, but the planet has several valuable things like animals, trees and human beings. Scientifically we all are dependent on each other and we should be more educated to understand animal has their life, heart, feeling, so, just thinking we humans are valuable that can’t be enough, we should also protect animal in the natural world, we should build place for them for better living and we should take care of them accordingly that would make our every purpose so ethical.