Performance Evaluation
Who are you?
You are a team leader at Anders Consulting, a small but growing
strategy consulting firm in Atlanta. For a little over three
months, you have been supervising a team of junior-level management
consultants, who just finished developing a strategic plan with a
division of RGP Financial Services.
What's the current situation?
The work you have supervised has involved a variety of research,
interviewing, writing, and speaking activities. Part of your job as
team leader is to collect and calculate ratings of each junior
consultant's performance based on his or her teammates' input over
the course of the RGP project. Table 1 shows the results for one of
those junior management consultants, Kyle Houston.
What's happening today?
Your boss, Inez Anders, sticks her head in your office after lunch
and says, "I need to schedule Kyle Houston's six-month review this
afternoon."
"Wow," you reply, "has he been here that long already? Seems like
he just got here."
"Sure has," Inez responds, "and I'm looking for someone to send to
our Dallas office as a team leader."
"Okay," you say, wondering why she's thinking of Kyle after only
six months with Anders.
"He had experience at KPMG in Dallas before moving here to Atlanta.
I know he wants to return to Dallas, and our Dallas office needs
another team leader now that they've signed on to do strategy work
with Nortel."
"So what do you need from me?" you ask.
"Well, I trust your judgment," Inez says, "and I know you've been
supervising Kyle's team for the past few months. I'd like you to
give me your opinion about whether he's ready for promotion to team
leader. You don't need to tell me now. Take some time this
afternoon to think about it."
Table 1
----------
Ratings based on all 15 collected team evaluations over three
evaluation periods.
3 = The member has performed very well in this area.
2 = The member has performed OK in this area.
1 = The member has not performed very well in this area.
0 = The member has performed poorly in this area.
Kyle Houston
Overall Rating: Mean (2.42) Mode (2)
Major Assessment Categories ... Specific Behaviors
Contributing ... Mean (2.83) Range (2 to 3)
Offers ideas, suggestions, etc.
Attends all meetings.
Meets all deadlines.
Listening ... Mean (1.96) Range (0 to 3)
Lets other members talk.
Limits discussion to main point of meeting.
Summarizes or clarifies other members' ideas.
Resists telling other members what to think.
Facilitating Group Problem Solving ... Mean (2.18) Range (0 to
3)
Asks questions to organize discussion.
Defines questions in order to stay on topic.
Selects criteria for evaluating suggested ideas.
Encourages suggestions of alternative solutions.
Discards all but the best solution.
----------
"OK," you reply. "Well, I have just finished calculating that
team's evaluations so I'd like to look back over his
performance--that way I've got something to go on besides my own
opinion."
"That's why we promoted you!" Inez says. "You know we believe in
making decisions based on data and also how much we value group
leadership skills here at Anders. After all, every project is
handled by a team. Team leaders like you are critical in keeping
our clients happy."
You smile as you let your boss's praise sink in and then ask, "How
soon do you need my input?"
"Can you get it to me before I leave this afternoon?" Inez
asks.
"Sure, Inez. I'll get on it right away," you reply.
As your boss leaves, you realize she's giving you another
opportunity to prove your potential to move up at Anders. You think
about your boss as you look for the performance data on Kyle for
the recent RPG project. You know she feels strongly that
performance reviews should be honest and developmental; in other
words, they should provide a clear picture of an employee's
strengths and weaknesses in order to provide a basis for future
efforts to improve. It will be critical that you support your
opinion with specific examples of Kyle's behavior.
Use the data in Table 1 and your own experiences on teams to
deliver the body of a message to your boss.
Question.
Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to support
your ideas, and which clearly communicates the required message to
your audience. Organize your response in a clear and logical manner
as appropriate for the genre of writing.
Being a team leader at Anders Consulting, my response to my boss about Kyle Houston's performance is as follows-
Kyle Houston's Overall Rating- Mean (2.42) and Mode (2)
This review covered specific behavior skills namely contributing, listening, and facilitating group problem-solving.
In contributing, Kyle has received a mean of 2.83, which means he has performed very well in this area. I have observed that Kyle is always contributing to achieving assigned targets by offering new ideas, suggestions, etc. For example, once an unplanned problem came up and he was the one who creatively determined a path to resolve the problem. Also, he is always attending meetings and has never failed in meeting deadlines. However when it comes to listening skills, Kyle has a scope of improvement as his team members rated him 1.96 (mean). Allso, many members during the project said that Kyle sometimes does not let other members talk and fails to clarify other members' ideas. One area where Kyle’s performance is satisfactory is when he identified to facilitate group problem solving. He usually puts up questions to organize discussion. He is also capable of selecting criteria for evaluating suggested ideas. Based on this rating and my personal opinion I would suggest that Kyle will be perfect for the Dallas office requirement.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.