Question

A company is evaluating Kansas City and Atlanta as alternative locations for a new plant to...

A company is evaluating Kansas City and Atlanta as alternative locations for a new plant to manufacture PC’s for small businesses. The following information has been collected. They want to use this information to compare the two locations. Different SME’s (subject matter experts) scored each of the non-economic factors. So, unfortunately, the scores for the non-economic factors are scaled differently. The scales are indicated on the table. On each scale, the highest score is always the best value. For example, for the scale 0-4, the best value is 4. For each of the Non-economic factors, it is possible to score the maximum.  

Critical Success Factor

Factor Weight

Scale

Kansas City

Atlanta

Cost per computer

0.50

$3,900

$4,300

Non-economic factors

Cost of living

0.10

0-2

1.2

1.4

Labor availability

0.10

0-3

2.1

2.1

Union activities

0.15

0-4

1.6

2.4

Proximity to similar industries

0.10

0-2

1.4

1.0

Local transportation systems

0.05

0-2

1.4

1.8

a) Using the factor scoring (rating) method as we learned in class, which site should be selected?

b) Suppose that the company wants to consider Omaha as a third site. Although the cost per computer for Omaha has not been determined yet, the company does know it will be at least $3,900. The scores for the qualitative factors have been determined and are the following:  

Critical Success Factor

Omaha

Cost per computer

???

Cost of living

1.4

Non-economic factors

Labor availability

1.5

Union activities

2.2

Proximity to similar industries

1.0

Local transportation systems

1.2

Given the information provided in the problem and the additional information provided in this part of the problem, what is the Cost per computer for Omaha that makes it factor rating value the same Kansas City’s value?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The following problem is solved by following method.

The factor rating method states that the factor rating which has the highest total score is the best alternative

so the site with highest total score must be selected as our site.

The Factor weight is weighted by the expert as their own measure.

The factor with most importance is weighted highest

The summation of Factor weight should be 1

Part 1

1. calculate the X score which is a product of factor weight (FW) and Kansas city scale (Kscale) of kansas city.

2.Similarly Calculate the X score which is a product of factor weight (FW) and Atlanta(Ascale) of Atlanta.

3. calculate the total score of each city by summation of Xscore as shown below

Critical Success Factor

Factor Weight

(FW)

KansasCity

(Kscale)

X score (FW*kscale)

Atlanta

(Ascale)

Xscore

(FW*Ascale)

Cost per computer 0.5 $3,900 0.5x3900=1950 $4,300 0.5x4300=2150
Non-economic factors
Cost of living 0.1 1.2 0.1x1.2=0.12 1.4 0.1x1.4=0.14
Labor availability 0.1 2.1 0.1x2.1=0.21 2.1 0.1x2.1=0.21
Union activities 0.15 1.6 0.15x1.6=0.24 2.4 0.15x2.4=0.36
Proximity to similar industries 0.1 1.4 0.1x1.4=0.14 1 0.1x1=0.1
Local transportation systems 0.05 1.4 0.05x1.4=0.07 1.8 .05x1.8=0.09
Total Score 1950.78 2150.9

Here we can see that Atlanta has the highest total score so we will select Atlanta as our site

Part 2

Critical Success Factor Factor Weight(FW) Ohmaha (Oscale) xscore (FWxOscale)
Cost per computer 0.5 3900 0.5x3900=1950
Non-economic factors
Cost of living 0.1 1.4 0.1x1.4=0.14
Labor availability 0.1 1.5 0.1x1.5=0.15
Union activities 0.15 2.2 0.15x2.2=0.33
Proximity to similar industries 0.1 1 0.1x1=0.1
Local transportation systems 0.05 1.2 0.05x1.2=0.06

Total score=1950.78

Here the Summation of scale of Omaha is equal to that of kansas city

Above is the calculation of the Factor rating method of Omaha.

The Total scale summation of Omha = FWxOscale

The Total scale summation = 0.1x1.4+0.1x1.5+0.15x2.2+0.1x1+0.005x1.2

=0.78

The Total scale summation of kansas city =FWxKscale

The Total scale summation of kansas city=0.1x1.2+0.1x2.1+0.15x1.6+0.1x1.4+0.05x1.4

=0.78

As we can see that the Total scale summation of both kansas city and Omaha is equal we can infer that the cost per computer in Omaha is $3900. As Both Kansas city and Omaha has same scale score

So when we consider the cost per computer of Omaha with its factor weight we will get atleast $3900

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
The Security National Bank is considering two locations for a new branch. The two choices are...
The Security National Bank is considering two locations for a new branch. The two choices are a major mall and a strip mall. The site selection team is evaluating two sites, and they have scored the critical success factors for each as shown below. The weights reflect the same relative importance as we have used in class. They want to use these ratings to compare the locations Critical Success Factor Factor Weight Major Mall Site Strip Mall Site Relocation Cost...
Sweetie Pies Bakery that is famous for its creative Moon Cake intends to open a new...
Sweetie Pies Bakery that is famous for its creative Moon Cake intends to open a new branch. It has identified three possible locations in Skudai, Ipoh and Kuantan to build the new branch. The following table contains information about the weight and score of factors for the three locations.      Location (out of 100) Factor Weight Skudai Ipoh Kuantan Convenient 0.15 80 70 60 Parking Facilities 0.20 72 76 92 Cost of living 0.18 88 90 90 Traffic condition 0.27...
CASE STUDY – Jacobson Carpet Company In January 2002, Ms. Mary Lewis was preparing to meet...
CASE STUDY – Jacobson Carpet Company In January 2002, Ms. Mary Lewis was preparing to meet with Mr. Carpenter, President of Jacobson Carpet Company. Ms. Lewis assumed that the meeting was related to the recent Board of directors of the company. As a direct assistant to the President, she knew from experience that this type of meeting often resulted in a project to be studied. Her expectation was confirmed as soon as Mr. Carpenter began to inform her of the...
Delta airlines case study Global strategy. Describe the current global strategy and provide evidence about how...
Delta airlines case study Global strategy. Describe the current global strategy and provide evidence about how the firms resources incompetencies support the given pressures regarding costs and local responsiveness. Describe entry modes have they usually used, and whether they are appropriate for the given strategy. Any key issues in their global strategy? casestudy: Atlanta, June 17, 2014. Sea of Delta employees and their families swarmed between food trucks, amusement park booths, and entertainment venues that were scattered throughout what would...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues?...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues? ???ALASKA AIRLINES: NAVIGATING CHANGE In the autumn of 2007, Alaska Airlines executives adjourned at the end of a long and stressful day in the midst of a multi-day strategic planning session. Most headed outside to relax, unwind and enjoy a bonfire on the shore of Semiahmoo Spit, outside the meeting venue in Blaine, a seaport town in northwest Washington state. Meanwhile, several members of...