Question

1. A rushed simplification is a fallacy of:

Select one:

a. Judgment

b. Satisfactory premises

c. Adequate but untrue evidences

d. Undesirable premises

.

2. While considering a imperfect analogy, the things being associated are:

Select one:

a. Satisfactorily comparable

b. Not sufficiently similar in relevant ways

c. Thorough opposites

d. Suitably similar in unrelated ways

.

3. when arguing that what is considered true of the parts must be true of the whole falls under the fallacy of:

Select one:

a. Appeal to unawareness

b. Appeal to the individual

c. Conformation

d. Disagreement

Answer 1

ANSWER 1 :

option A : Judgment

Explanation : It was discussed that a rushed simplification is a fallacy of judgment. It is not related to adequate but untrue evidences because rushed simplification is related to inadequate evidences.

ANSWER 2 :

option D : Suitably similar in unrelated ways

Explanation : While considering a imperfect analogy, the things being associated are Suitably similar in unrelated ways.

ANSWER 3 :

option D : Disagreement

Explanation : When arguing that what is considered true of the parts must be true of the whole falls under the fallacy of Disagreement.

Please Please up vote my answer. Thank you soo much.