Question

• Note the differences between documenting juvenile infractions versus that of adult offenders. What are some of these differences specifically?

• Do you think that there should be differences in how the juvenile probation system and adult probation system work? Why or why not? Explain your answer, citing at least one reputable source backing your opinion

Answer 1

The Differences between the documenting juvenile infractions versus that of adult offenders are:

· Adults are indicted for committing crimes while juveniles are indicted for doing criminal action. If the criminal actions are significant, such as very crimes of sadism such as murder, the court method may order to impose the juvenile as an adult, in which instance they would struggle in the adult criminal order.

· Juveniles are seeking what is called a refereeing listening rather than a public case with aboard. In a refereeing listening, a judge listens all the proofs then creates a decision as to either the juvenile is or is not delinquent.

· If the judge states the juvenile is delinquent, the court then declares what another course of steps should be.

· Whereas the adult criminal system aims to penalize, the juvenile crime system aims to improve and perform what is in the minor's finest heed. Therefore, there is so many substitute judgment utilized to remain juveniles out of bars. These substitutes involve probation, diversionary programs, and clearance.

Yes, there should be differences in how the juvenile probation system and adult probation system work because juveniles and adults should be handle individually, a different justice order for juveniles operates.