Case Study:
Henderson Printing is a small- to medium-sized manufacturer of
account books, ledgers, and various types of record books used in
business. Located in Halifax, the company has annual sales of about
$12 million, mostly in the Atlantic provinces.
The owner, George Henderson, is a firm believer in making a
high-quality product that will stand up to many years of use. He
uses only high-grade paper, cover stock, and binding materials. Of
course, this has led to high production costs and high prices. He
also believes in a high level of customer service and is willing to
make the products to customers’ specifications whenever they so
request. However, resetting the equipment for relatively short
production runs of customized products takes considerable extra
time and, of course, also drives up costs.
The firm employs about 80 people, most of whom work in production.
The firm has a few supervisors to oversee production, but their
responsibilities are not clearly spelled out, so the supervisors
often contradict one another. There is no system for scheduling
production; in fact, there are few systems of any kind. Whenever
there is a problem, everyone knows that you have to go to George if
you expect a definite answer.
The company also has several salespeople who travel throughout the
Atlantic region; most of them are relatives of George or his wife.
The company has one book- keeper to keep records and issue the
paycheques, and several office employees to handle routine
administrative chores. The firm has no specialists in accounting,
marketing, human resources, or production; George handles these
areas himself, although he has no real training and little interest
in any of them except production. He focuses most of his attention
on ensuring product quality and on dealing with the countless
problems that everyone brings to him every day. He has often been
heard to exclaim, in his usual good-natured way, ‘Why am I the only
one who can make decisions around this place?” as he deals with
each of these problems.
When George was growing up, both his parents (his father was a
printer and his mother was a seamstress in a garment factory) had
to work hard in order to scratch out a living for their family. In
those days, employers who showed little consideration for their
employees were the norm, and George resolved that things would be
different if he ever became an employer. Today, George tries hard
to be a benevolent employer. Although he feels the organization
cannot afford any formal employee benefits, he often keeps sick
workers on payroll for a considerable time, especially if he knows
the worker has a family to support. George is well liked by most
employees, who have shown little inter- est in unionization during
the few approaches made by union organizers.
George has no formal system for pay and tends to make all pay
decisions on the spur of the moment, so almost everybody has a
different pay rate. He has never gotten around to giving annual
raises, so any employee who wants a raise has to approach him. He
gives raises to most people who approach him, but the amount
depends on his mood at the time and on how well he knows the
employee. For example, if the firm has just lost a major customer,
raises are lower, and if the firm has just booked a large order,
they are higher. They are also higher if he knows the employee has
a family to support, or if the employee’s spouse has been laid off,
or if the employee has added a new member to the family.
George believes that a good employer should recognize the
contributions made by employees during the year. So every
Christmas, if profits allow, he gives merit bonuses to employees,
which he says are based on their contributions to the firm. One day
in early December, he sits down with his employee list, in
alphabetical order, and pencils in an amount next to each
name.
Everybody gets something, but the amounts vary greatly. If he can
associate a face with the name (which is difficult sometimes,
because new employees seem to turn over a lot), he tends to give
larger bonuses. And if he can remember something such as a cheer-
ful attitude, the bonuses are higher still. But if he remembers
anyone complaining about that employee for some reason or another
(he usually can’t recall the exact reasons), the employee gets a
smaller bonus. Not surprisingly, longer-term employees tend to
receive much higher bonuses than new employees. He has noticed this
tendency, but assumes that if an employee has been with the firm
longer, that person must be more produc- tive, so this is fair. He
personally distributes the bonus cheques on the last working day
before Christmas.
Since he has just turned 60, George is planning to retire in the
next year or two and turn the business over to his daughter,
Georgette Henderson, who is just finishing her commerce degree at
Dalhousie University. Ironically, it was on the day of his 60th
birthday that his bookkeeper informed him that there wasn’t enough
money in the bank account to meet payroll.
1. “Henderson Printing” currently has no formal performance
appraisal system. The CEO, Georgette Henderson, thinks that a
performance appraisal system might be useful, and she has hired you
to assess the company and recommend whether to implement one. She
also wants to know whether she should link pay to the appraisals.
She expects your report to include the pros and cons of each idea,
along with a detailed justification for your recommendations.
2. CEO Henderson has decided to go ahead with a performance
appraisal system, and she has decided to link it to merit pay.
Impressed with your earlier work for the company (see Question 1),
she has hired you to design the performance appraisal system and a
merit pay system that will be linked to it. She expects your report
to be sufficiently comprehensive that it can serve as the blueprint
for implementing these systems.
Read the Henderson Printing case and answer the following
questions:
What is your opinion of the compensation system in place there?
Explain.
Do you think it meets the criteria for an effective compensation
system? Explain
1) Because Henderson Printing have a informal organization structure.Where there is no payroll structure and divided responsibility among people. We can adopt the mixture of Indirect financial compensation and Non-financial compensation. Where George can pay the compensation in the form of non-cash benefit.
In the Indirect financial compensation, George can pay the compensation in the form of health insurance, paid time off and disability option. Whereas, in the Non-financial compensation George can make the environment.which is favorable for the employees. In both the compensation direct monetary is not involved. But, George can satisfy there employees by giving other benefits.
2) Yes, it can be meet the criteria of the compensation system. Because as given in the case, Henderson Printing currently has no formal performance appraisal system and they don't have enough money in the bank account to meet payroll.So, I think giving direct compensation can lose the company. In the current situation, the best way to give the compensation to the employee is to give in the form of non-cash benefit. Both the compensation method can help the company to boost up the employees and motivate them to work hard for the company. The main benefit of these compensation method is that there is no need of direct monetary. You can pay the money after some time. Which can help the company to continue there daily operations.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.