Explain how HR examines an effective process in maintaining or improving employee job performance. What are various Performance Appraisal methods and errors which impact the relationship between appraiser and appraisee.
PLEASE LEAVE A LIKE. IT HELPS ME A LOT. THANK YOU!!!
In the last few years the human resources department 's function has grown to evolve beyond simply by implementing policies and practices, interviewing, retaining, boarding, and handling employees. HR leaders also realize that they need to maintain a favorable image of employers, build programs that improve employee involvement and profitability, and develop partnerships between the business and staff past the organization 's lifetime. Since HR has very much to do, it is not necessarily granted top priority to boost the current workplace morale and productivity. HR leaders also concentrate on recruiting potential employees by creating incentive packages that bring the rewards up to date with emerging developments in the industry. Below are some of the effective processes for maintaining or improving employee job performance:
Performance Appraisal Methods:
Performance appraisals are used to rate the employee’s performance. Formal performance appraisals are important to organizations because they clarify the employee’s roles and responsibilities, and helps align individual goals with organizational goals. Formal performance appraisals also allow for evaluation of the employee’s performance and contribution towards organizational goals. Formal performance appraisals can also be a learning tool for employees and management through the feedback process of the appraisal. During the feedback process, management should express what the employee has done well and they have not. Management should elaborate on ways the employee can improve performance in areas the employee does not perform well. A performance appraisal is an activity which is of utmost importance to an individual as well as to the organisation. The performance appraisal process is crucial because it either makes or breaks an individual's career within the organisation if we think at the extreme levels. It is often noticed that in today's scenario the performance appraisal processes have become more practical where employees are given an all round feedback of their strengths and weaknesses and what they should do to excel in their jobs. On the other the hand the appraisers role has become more stringent as most of them are not open to criticism and there is a lot of discussion on the given feedback especially with the youngest generation of people. In this scenario, it depends a lot on the relationship between the appraiser and the appraisee. The reason being, if there is a genuine feedback that is given to an employee by his or her boss then there are two probabilities that the feedback would be taken in a positive way or in a negative way. Now, if the feedback is taken in a positive way, it depends a lot on the relationship between the two parties. If their relationship is good, then the appraiser can make the appraisee understand in a more subtle as he is open to listen. On the other hand if the relationship between these two parties is not good, there would always be a blame game from both the parties and overall there would be no meaning to the appraisal process. Therefore, the process needs to be stringent and effective. If the prices is not effective then there would be great difficulty in retaining the employees or keeping the employees satisfied, finally it would lead to higher attrition. Overall, the processes should be made clear to all the parties and they should follow the same keeping aside all the differences or favours they might have had in the past. Only if these things are put in place, can an appraisal process be made more effective.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.