Question

What would your response be to each discussion post. (2 responses) kindly, please provide references. Thank...

What would your response be to each discussion post. (2 responses) kindly, please provide references. Thank you.


  1. When a claim is credible it is properly supported by evidence, experience or self-evident. "A claim lacks inherent credibility to the extent that it conflicts with what we have observed or what we think we know - our background information - or with other credible claims" (Moore & Parker, 2017). It is credible if it asserts something that is known to be true. The source in which the claim comes from also has an influence on credibility. For example, some online sources can be biased or contain errors. When assessing a claim, you want to ask yourself if this claim conflicts with your personal observations or background knowledge. Then you would look into the source and if the source has real knowledge on the topic.


  1. Credibility can be defined as the quality or power of inspiring belief (Moore & Parker, 2017). “A claim lacks inherent credibility to the extent that it conflicts with what we have observed or what we think we know, our background information or with some credible claims” (Moore & Parker, 2017). Credible sources must be reliable with information that can be found true. Typically, a person who has a lot of information about a relevant claim can be seen as reliable. For example, if I am interested in learning how to sail, I would give credibility to a sailing instructor who has sailed around the world and has many tricks and tips for smooth sailing. The instructor is credible because their experience is real and truthful to this particular situation. If I needed confirmation about this particular topic, I may refer to a research article or textbook on how to sail.

Ways to evaluate a claim for credibility may be through credentials, experience, reliability, quality, and evidence that can be found in research articles and academic databases. It is important to find credible and reliable sources because there tends to be many unreliable sources that can be found in a person or even online that do not have accurate information.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

It is generally reasonable to accept an unsupported claim if it does not conflict with your own observations, your background knowledge, or with other credible claims and if it comes from a credible source that you do not suspect of bias.

Credible means able to be trusted or believed.

There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not.

1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source.

2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution.

3) Currency.

4) Coverage.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
What would your response be to these two discussion board responses from students: 1. My definition...
What would your response be to these two discussion board responses from students: 1. My definition of knowledge is information that you acquire throughout your life that you can use for your benefit. Truth when talking about information is tricky because you need to do research in order to find out if something is truthful. that is where belief comes in to play. will you believe something to be true just because you saw a video on it? will you...
Post a response (2-4 sentences each). You can start a discussion by pointing out additional reasons...
Post a response (2-4 sentences each). You can start a discussion by pointing out additional reasons why you think this source is or is not credible. You can also suggest ways in which the site could be improved (is there information or are there sources they could have added? Are there different messages that would be more appropriate?). Write at least 1 response-post for each of the THREE “Part 1” posts you read (you will need at least 3 responses...
Post a response (2-4 sentences each). You can start a discussion by pointing out additional reasons...
Post a response (2-4 sentences each). You can start a discussion by pointing out additional reasons why you think this source is or is not credible. You can also suggest ways in which the site could be improved (is there information or are there sources they could have added? Are there different messages that would be more appropriate?). Write at least 1 response-post for each of the THREE “Part 1” posts you read (you will need at least 3 responses...
Reflect back on your draft. Reread it. Analyze it. What are the strengths of your draft?...
Reflect back on your draft. Reread it. Analyze it. What are the strengths of your draft? What areas will need improvement? The Treatment of Special Needs Children Abstract            Special needs children are still on the receiving end of abuse despite the increased clamor against their mistreatment. Also, they are likely to face discrimination and abuse in their homes and their social spheres; they have limited opportunities for quality education and can find trouble getting adequate medical assistance. The management of...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT