Question

Many Americans believed their future health care costs would be covered by their employers, yet a generation of current and near-term prospective retirees has had their health insurance curtailed or eliminated outright. Does the government now have an ethical obligation to provide affordable access to health care since it failed to protect employee expectations?

Does Congress have an ethical obligation to provide more effective tax incentives for employers to prefund retiree health benefits, complete with a government agency guarantee in case of employer bankruptcy? What prospective or remedial relief should government be required to provide to innocent victims of cancelled employer assurances of health benefits?

The above 2 questions have been answered already!!!

How do the principles of fairness, justice, and care apply to retiree health benefits in this situation? Should it fall to the government to address current and near-term prospective retirees' claims of broken promises?

This is for a discussion post. Please provide at least 50 words in your response. Thanks in advance.

Answer 1

-Advices about fairness arrive into argument about policy improvement in one of two habits, moreover as a restraint on policy creation, a standard that has to be content by all suggestions for alteration, or as an indispensable portion of the foundation for modification.

-In the first circumstance it is acknowledged that present policy has to be different for details that have nonentity to do with fairness; and hitherto we requisite make certain that the compulsory vicissitudes have no unwanted consequence on the fairness of the preparations under deliberation.

-In the additional circumstance it is contended that current policy must be altered since, as it opinions, it is unfair.