During rounds Charles encounters a rare condition he has never personally seen, and only vaguely remembers hearing about in nursing school. He takes a few moments to prepare himself by searching the Internet. That evening, he researches even further to treat, administer, and assess the patient safely. He searches clinical databases online and his own school textbooks. Most of the information seems consistent, yet some factors vary. Charles wants to provide the highest quality in patient safety.
What should Charles do when he encounters information in two sources that is directly contradictory?
Which resources are the most trusted?
Which resources are the most accurate?
What criteria should Charles use to identify credible resources to enhance his clinical practice?
Answer: Charles should use that information which are similar in both of the context. As it will create more accuracy and try to avoid the contraindicated things or the things which mentioned are totally opposite to eachother.
Sometimes there are some error in the textbooks so, Charles should properly check the clinical database because anything mentioned over there is thoroughly checked and then it is displayed on the database.
He can also concern other healthcare professionals if he wants to give an advance quality of care.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.