Is the court deciding a question of fact or a question of law in the Iturralde v. Hilo medical center case
Answer: The court deciding a question of facts in the iturralde V.Hilo medical center case. The jury found that both Dr. Ricketson and HMC were negligent, and their negligence was a substantial factor in causing Arturo's harm. The jury apportioned 65% of the fault to Dr. Ricketson and 35% to HMC. It awarded $307,000 in special damages to Arturo's Estate, $1.7 million in general damages to the Estate, and $170,000 in general damages to Rosalinda. It also awarded $3.4 million in punitive damages against Dr. Ricketson individually. The jury did not apportion any of Arturo's harm to pre-existing injuries.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.