Do you agree that the definition of harm from the Harvard Medical Practice Study is too narrow? Why would it be advantageous to take a broader view of harm?
According to the definition of Harvard Medical Practice study given to Harm is "measureable disability at discharge or increased length of stay due to the event"
Agreeing with this definition is little difficult because it is very narrow and needs a broader explanation so that one could understand the entire meaning and stimulating to think in broader manner
Some of the advantages of taking a broader view of harm are as following
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.