explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress' decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.
Legislators re-election impact ACA provisions. Adults with coverage of Medicaid under ACA rules affected due to legislators. Re-election for Medicaid expansion that includes the elimination of subsidies, Medicaid funding and loss of consumer protection. Repeal legislation can makeover the gap on congressional effects and government preference. The potential loss of coverage and benefits from repealing financial assistance provisions and Medicaid coverage that opposed the reveal. Public will be affected with repeal efforts.Votes analysis reveals make issues in leaders policy choices. It results in the public to limit their options when the leader's policy was adopted. It affects the Congress decisions that impact the Medicare and Medicaid coverage policy for adults.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.