Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress' decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected.
Reelection by lawmakers has an effect on ACA provisions. Adults protected by Medicaid under the ACA regulations which are governed by lawmakers. Re-election of Medicaid expansion which involves the removal of subsidies, Medicaid funding and the lack of protection for consumers. The elimination of law will make up the difference between the Legislative impact and government choice. The possible loss of coverage and benefits from repealing provisions on financial assistance and Medicaid coverage which opposed the disclosure. With repeal attempts the public will be affected. Vote research shows the problems occur in policy decisions made by politicians. When the leader's agenda was implemented, it resulted in the public restricting their options. It affects legislative decisions regarding medicare and Medicaid coverage policy for adults.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.