Question

You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...

You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) the present value of two years’ back pay. The plaintiff’s annual salary for the last two years would have been $38,000 and $42,000, respectively. (b) The present value of five years’ future salary. You assume the salary will be $45,000 per year. (c) $150,000 for pain and suffering. (d) $20,000 for court costs. Assume that the salary payments are paid annually. If the interest rate is 8 percent, what is the size of the settlement? If you were the plaintiff (person receiving the award), would you like to see a higher or lower interest rate?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Present value of 2 year back salary = [$38,000 × (1 + 8%) ^ 2] + [$42,000 × (1 + 8%) ^ 1]

= ($38,000 × 1.1664) + ($42,000 × 1.08)

= $44,323.20 + $48,988.80

= $93,312.

Present value of 2 year back salary is $93,312.

Present value of 5-year future salary is calculated in excel and screen shot provided below:

Present value of 5-year future salary is $179,671.95

Total Value of check = PV of past 2-year salary + PV of future 5-year salary + pay for pain and suffering + court cost

= $93,312 + $179,671.95 + $150,000 + $20,000

= $442,983.95

Total Size of settlement is $442,983.95.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) the present value of two years’ back...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (1) The present value of two years’ back...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (a) The present value of two years’ back...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after...
You are serving on a jury. A plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after a freak street sweeper accident. In the trial, doctors testified that it will be five years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. The jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff. You are the foreperson of the jury and propose that the jury give the plaintiff an award to cover the following: (1) The present value of two years’ back...
eBook It is now December 31, 2018 (t = 0), and a jury just found in...
eBook It is now December 31, 2018 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2017 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $300,000 for pain and suffering plus $60,000 for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the...
It is now December 31, 2017 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor...
It is now December 31, 2017 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2016 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $400,000 for pain and suffering plus $80,000 for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the jury...
It is now December 31, 2017 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor...
It is now December 31, 2017 (t = 0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2016 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $250,000 for pain and suffering plus $50,000 for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the jury...
It is now December 31, 2014 (t=0), and a jury just found in favor of a...
It is now December 31, 2014 (t=0), and a jury just found in favor of a woman who sued the city for injuries sustained in a January 2013 accident. She requested recovery of lost wages plus $100,000 for pain and suffering plus $20,000 for legal expenses. Her doctor testified that she has been unable to work since the accident and that she will not be able to work in the future. She is now 62, and the jury decided that...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore. At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later...