Average Rate of Return Method, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis
The capital investment committee of Nature’s Portrait Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated income from operations and net cash flows from each investment are as follows:
Front-End Loader | Greenhouse Fixtures | |||||||
Year | Income from Operations | Net Cash Flow | Income from Operations | Net Cash Flow | ||||
1 | $25,000 | $ 40,000 | $11,250 | $ 26,250 | ||||
2 | 20,000 | 35,000 | 11,250 | 26,250 | ||||
3 | 7,000 | 22,000 | 11,250 | 26,250 | ||||
4 | 3,000 | 18,000 | 11,250 | 26,250 | ||||
5 | 1,250 | 16,250 | 11,250 | 26,250 | ||||
$56,250 | $131,250 | $56,250 | $131,250 |
Each project requires an investment of $75,000. Straight-line depreciation will be used, and no residual value is expected. The committee has selected a rate of 12% for purposes of the net present value analysis.
Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest | |||||
Year | 6% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 20% |
1 | 0.943 | 0.909 | 0.893 | 0.870 | 0.833 |
2 | 0.890 | 0.826 | 0.797 | 0.756 | 0.694 |
3 | 0.840 | 0.751 | 0.712 | 0.658 | 0.579 |
4 | 0.792 | 0.683 | 0.636 | 0.572 | 0.482 |
5 | 0.747 | 0.621 | 0.567 | 0.497 | 0.402 |
6 | 0.705 | 0.564 | 0.507 | 0.432 | 0.335 |
7 | 0.665 | 0.513 | 0.452 | 0.376 | 0.279 |
8 | 0.627 | 0.467 | 0.404 | 0.327 | 0.233 |
9 | 0.592 | 0.424 | 0.361 | 0.284 | 0.194 |
10 | 0.558 | 0.386 | 0.322 | 0.247 | 0.162 |
Required:
1a. Compute the average rate of return for each investment. If required, round your answer to one decimal place.
Average Rate of Return | |
Greenhouse | % |
Front End Loader | % |
1b. Compute the net present value for each investment. Use the present value of $1 table above. If required, round to the nearest dollar.
Front End Loader | Greenhouse | |
Present value of net cash flow total | $ | $ |
Less amount to be invested | $ | $ |
Net present value | $ | $ |
2. The front end loader has a net present value because cash flows occur earlier in time compared to the greenhouse fixtures. Thus, if only one of the two projects can be accepted, the would be the more attractive.
Average Rate of Return = Average Net Income/Average Investment
Average Investment = (Beginning Investment + Ending Investment)/2
= (75,000+0)/2
= $37,500
Average rate of return = Average Income/Average Investment
Front end Loader = 11,250/37,500
=30%
Greenhouse = 11,250/37,500
=30%
1b. NPV = Present value of cash inflows – Present value of cash outflows
Front end Loader |
Greenhouse |
|
Present Value of net cash flow |
99,940,75 |
26,250*3.605 = $94,631.25 |
Amount to be invested |
75000 |
75000 |
Net Present Value |
24,940.75 |
19,631.25 |
Higher NPV, Earlier in time
Front end loader is more attractive
Higher net present value of front end loader makes it a better investment
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.