Petrus has an opportunity to make two investments, but he can only afford to make one of them. Each one costs $ 25,000,000. The first investment can be sold in 14 years for $ 98,500,000 and has no periodic cash flow. The second investment has a $ 200,000 per month cash flow for 6 years followed by a cash flow of $ 400,000 per month for 8 years. The second investment has no resale value. Which investment is better, from the standpoint of IRR?
Yr | Cash Flow 1 | Cash Flow 2 | |||||||
0 | -25000000 | -25000000 | |||||||
1 | 0 | 2400000 | |||||||
2 | 0 | 2400000 | |||||||
3 | 0 | 2400000 | |||||||
4 | 0 | 2400000 | |||||||
5 | 0 | 2400000 | |||||||
6 | 0 | 2400000 | |||||||
7 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
8 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
9 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
10 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
11 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
12 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
13 | 0 | 4800000 | |||||||
14 | 98,500,000 | 4800000 | |||||||
IRR | 10.29% | 9.94% | |||||||
Cash flow 2 is better due to lower IRR , i.e. after cost of capital of 9.94 % company will start earning | |||||||||
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.