Question

Lawyers who fail to abide by their profession's Code of Conduct may be sanctioned by their...

Lawyers who fail to abide by their profession's Code of Conduct may be sanctioned by their governing body, which in Alberta, is the Law Society of Alberta. What does section 3.2-4 of the Code of Conduct require?

a. A lawyer may decide to obtain instructions from the client on all matters not falling within the express or implied authority of the lawyer.

b. A lawyer must obtain instructions from the client on all matters, and there are no exceptions to this rule.

c. A client must obtain instructions from the lawyer on all matters not falling within the express or implied authority of the client.

d. A lawyer must obtain instructions from the client on all matters not falling within the express or implied authority of the lawyer.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer: d) A lawyer must obtain instructions from the client on all matters not falling within the express or implied authority of the lawyer.

"The code of conduct specifically mentions, a lawyer should obtain instructions from the client on all matters not falling within the express or implied authority of the lawyer".

Therefore option a) is incorrect since it uses the term "may" instead of "should" with respect to obtaining instructions from the client on matters not falling within the express or implied authority.

Similarly option b) is also incorrect since there is an exception in obtaining instructions ie: not falling within the express or implied authority.

there has been no mention regarding client obtaining instructions as mentioned in option c).

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you...
Please read the article and answear about questions. Determining the Value of the Business After you have completed a thorough and exacting investigation, you need to analyze all the infor- mation you have gathered. This is the time to consult with your business, financial, and legal advis- ers to arrive at an estimate of the value of the business. Outside advisers are impartial and are more likely to see the bad things about the business than are you. You should...
QUESTION 1 Which one of the following would NOT be necessary for an offer to have...
QUESTION 1 Which one of the following would NOT be necessary for an offer to have legal standing? A. The language must reflect the intent to become a party to a contract. B. All of the conditions under which the offer would be terminated must be identified. C. All the significant terms and/or conditions must be contained in the offer. D. The offer must be effectively communicated to the other party. 3 points    QUESTION 2 Which one of the...
In a bizarre twist to a bizarre story, on October 22, 2013, Deloitte agreed to pay...
In a bizarre twist to a bizarre story, on October 22, 2013, Deloitte agreed to pay a $2 million penalty to settle civil charges—brought by the PCAOB—that the firm violated federal audit rules by allowing its former partner to continue participating in the firm’s public company audit practice, even though he had been suspended over other rule violations. The former partner, Christopher Anderson, settled with the PCAOB in 2008 by agreeing to a $25,000 fine and a one-year suspension for...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in...
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case James M. Dedman, IV Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore. At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
Discuss how the respective organizations’ relations with stakeholders could have potentially been affected by the events...
Discuss how the respective organizations’ relations with stakeholders could have potentially been affected by the events that took place at Enron and how the situation could have been dealt with differently to prevent further damage? THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies,...
Actually a HISTORY question: what tactics does Einhard use to portray Charlemagne in "Life of Charlemagne"...
Actually a HISTORY question: what tactics does Einhard use to portray Charlemagne in "Life of Charlemagne" and what tactics does Procipius use to describe Justinian in a positive light in the "Nika Riots"? Ive posted both excerpts. "Life of Charlemagne" Charles the Great, (Charlemagne in French) reigned 768-814 as king of the Franks and the most important ruler of the Carolingian Dynasty, conquering lands in what is now Germany, France, Spain, and Italy. On Christmas Day 800 C.E., Pope Leo...
Read the attached articles about the proposed merger of Xerox and Fujifilm. Utilizing your knowledge of...
Read the attached articles about the proposed merger of Xerox and Fujifilm. Utilizing your knowledge of external and internal analysis, business and corporate strategy, and corporate governance, please discuss the following questions: 1. What is the corporate strategy behind the merger of Xerox and Fujifilm? 2. Why did Xerox agree to the merger? Is this a good deal for Xerox? Discuss the benefits and challenges they face with the merger. 3. Why did Fujifilm agree to the merger? Discuss the...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT