It is sometimes assumed in a two-stage dividend growth model that dividend growth drops from a high rate in the first stage to a low perpetual growth rate in the second stage. Comment on the reasonableness of this assumption and discuss what happens if this assumption is violated.
Hello,
In two stage dividend growth model, in 1 stage has an initial
unstable growth and second stage has a stable growth which may last
forever. In 1 stage growth is volatile and the second stage growth
is non- volatile and a stable growth.
This is because at a initial stage of business has
the good growth potential in the market, less competitors aid they
can be easily grow in 2 digits numbers ( say 30-40 percent) but
after a stage growth has to be declined at a single digit number
because every company as a peak time at that time company grow at a
slow pace. While at the first stage growth was quite
aggressive.
If this assumption is violated, means company can grow at a
agrressive stage forever, company has the lots of opportunity and
projects and all projects give the positive cashflow from there
projects.
This would not be possible because at some stage growth is decline
and company growth at a sustainable rate.
I hope this clear your doubt.
Feel free to comment if you still have any query or need something else. I'll help asap.
Do give a thumbs up if you find this helpful.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.