Question

TCO F) Which statement is true? In response to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the reporting costs were...

TCO F) Which statement is true? In response to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the reporting costs were reduced, and many non-U.S. firms that issued new shares of stock decided to place their stock in a U.S. stock exchange. Shareholders in all countries may have more power to effectively sue publicly traded firms if their executives or directors commit financial fraud. In general, common law countries, such as the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, allow for more legal protection to shareholders than French civil law countries, such as France and Italy. Global regulations require that shareholders in all countries have the same rights wherever there are stock markets.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

In response to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the reporting costs were reduced, and many non-U.S. firms that issued new shares of stock decided to place their stock in a U.S. stock exchange. FALSE

Shareholders in all countries may have more power to effectively sue publicly traded firms if their executives or directors commit financial fraud. This sentence construction seems wrong. Shareholders in ALL countries MAY (ALL and MAY together seems incorrect) . If it is ALL countries then the answer is FALSE but if it is SOME countries then the answer is TRUE

In general, common law countries, such as the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, allow for more legal protection to shareholders than French civil law countries, such as France and Italy. TRUE

Global regulations require that shareholders in all countries have the same rights wherever there are stock markets.FALSE

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT