1)
Given that the company already has a market valuation of $20 million, providing a 20% ownership to a growing company with strong fundamentals appears to be a bad deal especially when the quantum offered by the investor is just $3 million. The company already has strong credentials meaning that the company will not face much issues in gaining a bank loan and 9% is a very standard rate for debt financing. Further it would not dilute equity and the debt would be gone in a period of 5 years. Although I agree that debt financing will involve negative cashflows over the next 5 years, The net outgo would be close to
₹ -38,56,386.85 |
but I believe that is much better than an ownership of close to a minimum of $6.4 million in 5 years time .
2)
No John should not move forward with the investment and should go for debt finance instead.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.