Kyle’s Shoe Stores Inc. is considering opening an additional suburban outlet with the following data:
Probability NPV
.3 80
.3 130
.1 160
.3 170
What is the coefficient of variation for the new outlet? Round intermediate calculations and the answer to the hundredth place.
If a second possible outlet has a coefficient of variation of .50, would you prefer this second outlet over the first outlet considered? Enter yes or no.
Probability of outcome (P) | NPV (x) | Px | (x-Expected return)^2 | P*(x-Expected return)^2 |
0.30 | 80 | 24.00 | 2500.00 | 750.00 |
0.30 | 130 | 39.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
0.10 | 160 | 16.00 | 900.00 | 90.00 |
0.30 | 170 | 51.00 | 1600.00 | 480.00 |
Total | 130.00 | 5000.00 | 1320.00 | |
Expected NPV= ∑Px= 130 | ||||
Variance OF NPV= ∑P*(x-Expected return)^2 | ||||
1320 | ||||
Standard deviation of NPV= Sq root of (Variance) | ||||
Sq root (1320) | ||||
36.332 | ||||
CVnpv= (SD/Mean) | ||||
(36.332/130) | ||||
0.279 | ||||
No, the second outlet will not be preferred as the coefficient of variation is higher in comparison to the first outlet. |
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.