Peter and Lois are a dual-earner couple with a young son, Chris. Peter and Lois each receive health care coverage for themselves from their respective employers. Their employers pay the premiums for the workers, and coverage for dependents is available if the worker pays the premium cost. They are trying to decide which policy to cover Chris under for the upcoming year. The following is a brief description of their policies and projected medical expenses for Chris.
Peter's HMO Coverage |
Lois's Major Medical Coverage |
|
Maximum Limits |
unlimited |
$500,000/year/person |
Deductible/Copayment |
$20/doctor's visit, $50/emergency clinic visit, $15/prescription, $ 0/in-hospital charges |
$500/year/person |
Participation |
not applicable |
175/20 with a $2,500/year/person cap |
Major exclusions |
Dental and vision |
Prescriptions, dental, and vision |
Monthly premiums for dependents |
$105/dependent/month |
$90/dependent/month |
Chris is a healthy 8-year-old who is accident prone. Based on his past medical records, Peter and Lois expect the following covered medical costs for the year:
6 trips to the doctor--average cost of $75 per trip
2 trips to the emergency clinic--average cost of $300 per trip
1 broken bone--average cost of in-hospital surgery $1,250
12 prescriptions--average cost of $45 per prescription
What would the combined cost of premiums plus out-of-pocket medical
costs be for Chris under Peter's HMO?
As per the available past record, the total medical expense for Chris per year is = 6 x 75 + 2 x 300 + 1 x 1250 + 12 x 45 = 2840
Annual medical expense as per Peter's HMO coverage = 105 x 12 (premium) + 6 x 20 (copayment) + 2 x 50 (copayment) + 15 x 12 (copayment) = 1660
Annual medical expense as per Lois's Major Medical coverage = 90 x 12 (premium) + 500 (copayment) + 12 x 45 (prescription as major exclusion) = 2120
Clearly, Peter's HMO coverage is better option.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.