Question

1. Non-compete agreements are unenforceable if not in writing. True/false

2. In 1994, the Arizona Supreme Court decided the case of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents and found a duty of care to avoid providing alcohol to underage consumers. If in 2010 a plaintiff from Flagstaff, a city in Arizona brings a lawsuit against a student group at an Arizona university of providing alcohol to members under the legal drinking age; will the Hernandez v. Arizona board of regent’s case serve as the precedent?

a. No because there are probably different facts

b. No because the states do not have to use precedent

c. Yes it will be used as precedent and it is binding

d. Yes but only if they wanted to use it because it is not binding on any other court

Answer 1

1.Non-compete agreements are unenforceable if not in writing the statement is true because the agreements that are not completed so it is considered as (True).

2.n 1994, the Arizona Supreme Court decided the case of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents and found a duty of care to avoid providing alcohol to underage consumers. If in 2010 a plaintiff from Flagstaff, a city in Arizona brings a lawsuit against a student group at an Arizona university of providing alcohol to members under the legal drinking age; will the Hernandez v. Arizona board of regent’s case serve as the precedent is to be proved in the court, Yes it will be used as precedent and it is binding(c),